Cylindrical Tank Height Calculation (1587kg, 3.2m)

  • Thread starter Thread starter shelli8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylindrical Tank
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the height of a cylindrical tank filled with water weighing 1587 kg and with a diameter of 3.2 meters, the formula for volume V = πr²h is used, where r is the radius. The volume can also be derived from mass and density, with water's density approximately 1 kg/L. After correcting for unit conversions and ensuring the proper formula is applied, the height is determined to be 0.20 meters. This height is reasonable given the tank's dimensions, as it corresponds to a significant volume of water. Accurate unit management and formula application are crucial in solving this problem.
shelli8
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have been stumped on this question for two days~!~
I am not even sure this is where to post this, but any answers or ideas or anything are greatly appreciated! the question is
'CALCULATE THE HEIGHT OF A CYLINDRICAL TANK FILLED WITH WATER HAVING A MASS OF 1587.0 KG. THE DIAMETER OF THE TANK IS 3.2 METERS, PLEASE HAVE THE ANSWER IN METERS'. I can't seem to convert the kilograms into meters, or I can't even find the height equation for this?~~! Any ideas?? thanks so much! shelli
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V=pi*r^2*h
volume = mass/density
1L = .001 m^3 (thanks for pointing that out turin :smile:)

Just assume the tank is just made of water with no container.. makes it easier

(edited)
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure, but I think you might want to be a little careful with your units (ρwater ~ 1 kg/L); I got a very different answer for h. Oh, and double check your formula for volume (the factor of 2?). Otherwise, I agree with your procedure.

I have Vcyl = πr2h (Abase x height).

Solving algebraically for h and then using the definition of density and stuff, I got h = 0.20 m. This seems reasonable since a 3.2 m wide cylindrical tank is the area of several bath tubs, and 0.20 m of water in them would be pretty heavy.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by turin
I'm not sure, but I think you might want to be a little careful with your units (ρwater ~ 1 kg/L); I got a very different answer for h. Oh, and double check your formula for volume (the factor of 2?). Otherwise, I agree with your procedure.
ah, you're right, I was thinking of the circumference and accidentally threw in the 2
 
Right on, that helps immensely, and even makes sense. Thanks for lending out your brains.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top