D'Alembert's principle on inclined plane problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying d'Alembert's principle to analyze the motion of a particle sliding down an inclined plane under the influence of gravity. Participants are exploring the equations of motion and the implications of their mathematical setup.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of virtual displacement and the relevant forces acting on the particle. There are attempts to derive the equations of motion, with some questioning the correctness of matrix multiplications and the assumptions made regarding dimensionality.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on potential errors in the original poster's approach, particularly regarding the constraints and the interpretation of the equations. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem setup, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a schematic that indicates the problem is two-dimensional, which may affect how participants perceive the displacement and forces involved. Additionally, there are references to different formulations of d'Alembert's principle that could influence the discussion.

PhysicsRock
Messages
121
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
Examine the motion of a particle with mass ##m## under the influence of the gravitational force ##\vec{F}_g = -mg \vec{e}_y## sliding down an inclined plane with angle ##\alpha##. The particle is initially positioned at ##\vec{r}(0) = (D,H)##.
Derive the equations of motions using d'Alemberts principle.
Relevant Equations
d'Alembert's principle ## \left( m \ddot{\vec{r}} - \vec{F}_i \right) \delta \vec{r} = 0 ##
The virtual displacement should be given by

$$
\delta\vec{r} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\alpha) \\ \sin(\alpha) \\ \end{pmatrix} \delta s
$$

where ##\delta s## is a displacement parallel to the plane. The relevant force should be the gravitational force, as given above. Thus, the equations of motion are ought to be

$$
\left[ \begin{pmatrix} m \ddot{x} \\ m \ddot{y} \end{pmatrix} - \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ -mg \\ \end{pmatrix} \right] \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\alpha) \\ \sin(\alpha) \\ \end{pmatrix} \delta s = m \begin{pmatrix} \ddot{x} \\ \ddot{y} + g \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\alpha) \\ \sin(\alpha) \\ \end{pmatrix} = 0
$$

Doing the multiplications I get

$$
\ddot{x} \cos(\alpha) + (\ddot{y} + g) \sin(\alpha) = 0
$$

Separating that I obtain

$$
\ddot{y} = -g \, , \, \ddot{x} = 0
$$

This, however, describes a free fall with no horizontal acceleration. I must've done something wrong obviously, I just cannot figure out what that is.

Any type of help is highly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsRock said:
Homework Statement: Examine the motion of a particle with mass ##m## under the influence of the gravitational force ##\vec{F}_g = -mg \vec{e}_y## sliding down an inclined plane with angle ##\alpha##. The particle is initially positioned at ##\vec{r}(0) = (D,H)##.
Derive the equations of motions using d'Alemberts principle.
Relevant Equations: d'Alembert's principle ## \left( m \ddot{\vec{r}} - \vec{F}_i \right) \delta \vec{r} = 0 ##

The virtual displacement should be given by

$$
\delta\vec{r} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\alpha) \\ \sin(\alpha) \\ \end{pmatrix} \delta s
$$

where ##\delta s## is a displacement parallel to the plane. The relevant force should be the gravitational force, as given above. Thus, the equations of motion are ought to be

$$
\left[ \begin{pmatrix} m \ddot{x} \\ m \ddot{y} \end{pmatrix} - \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ -mg \\ \end{pmatrix} \right] \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\alpha) \\ \sin(\alpha) \\ \end{pmatrix} \delta s = m \begin{pmatrix} \ddot{x} \\ \ddot{y} + g \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\alpha) \\ \sin(\alpha) \\ \end{pmatrix} = 0
$$

Doing the multiplications I get

$$
\ddot{x} \cos(\alpha) + (\ddot{y} + g) \sin(\alpha) = 0
$$

Separating that I obtain

$$
\ddot{y} = -g \, , \, \ddot{x} = 0
$$

This, however, describes a free fall with no horizontal acceleration. I must've done something wrong obviously, I just cannot figure out what that is.

Any type of help is highly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
I think you are doing your matrix multiplication incorrectly.

Never mind.
 
Last edited:
erobz said:
I think you are doing your matrix multiplication incorrectly.
It's just basic vector multiplication, isn't it? Multiply componentwise and add them up.
 
PhysicsRock said:
It's just basic vector multiplication, isn't it? Multiply componentwise and add them up.
Sorry, my bad.
 
PhysicsRock said:
The virtual displacement should be given by
Should it? Surely ##\vec r## is three dimensional, and there is a choice of directions to move within the plane.
 
haruspex said:
Should it? Surely ##\vec r## is three dimensional, and there is a choice of directions to move within the plane.
Excuse me, I should've mentioned that above, but together with the text comes a schematic that shows that this problem is 2-dimensional, i.e. the displacement only has to account for displacement in the ##x## and ##y## direction.
 
I don't know why you set each term equal to zero. I believe you need to use the constraint that:

##\ddot y = \ddot x \tan \alpha##

sub that in and see what you get for ##\ddot x##?

Also, Wiki has the principle quoted as the negative of what you have used.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D'Alembert's_principle#Special_case_with_constant_mass

I don't know if that matters fundamentally, but it might matter for making sense of the constraints.
 
erobz said:
I don't know why you set each term equal to zero. I believe you need to use the constraint that:

##\ddot y = \ddot x \tan \alpha##

sub that in and see what you get for ##\ddot x##?

Also, Wiki has the principle quoted as the negative of what you have used.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D'Alembert's_principle#Special_case_with_constant_mass

I don't know if that matters fundamentally, but it might matter for making sense of the constraints.
What you said worked. I had the constraint written down, just in the form that it's usually written in, i.e. ##g(\vec{r})=0## and for some reason I just didn't see that I could plug in ##\ddot{x}## in terms of ##\ddot{y}## or vise versa. Thank you a lot.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and erobz
PhysicsRock said:
Excuse me, I should've mentioned that above, but together with the text comes a schematic that shows that this problem is 2-dimensional, i.e. the displacement only has to account for displacement in the ##x## and ##y## direction.
ok, so it should have said sliding along a line, not in a plane.
Fwiw, in a plane (standard x, y, z coordinates, x axis lying in the plane) you would have ##\vec{\delta r}=\delta s(\cos(\theta), \sin(\theta)\cos(\alpha), \sin(\theta)\sin(\alpha))##, ##\ddot z=\ddot y\tan(\alpha)##, etc.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K