Dalton's law of partial pressure

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Dalton's law of partial pressures, exploring its derivation, implications, and the assumptions underlying its application to mixtures of gases. Participants engage with concepts from kinetic theory and the nature of ideal gases, examining whether Dalton's law is a strict law or an approximation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a rigorous proof of Dalton's law, indicating a desire for a deeper understanding.
  • Another participant argues that Dalton's law is an approximation, noting that it can be derived by neglecting intermolecular forces and the volume occupied by gas particles.
  • Some participants reference the kinetic theory of gases as a basis for understanding the law, suggesting that the assumption of non-colliding particles is crucial.
  • There is a discussion about the expression for total pressure in a gas mixture, with some participants questioning why the pressures can be simply added.
  • One participant recalls a professor demonstrating the concept mathematically, expressing uncertainty about whether Dalton's law is an approximation or exact for ideal gases.
  • A metaphor involving people and hammers is used to illustrate how pressures can add up, emphasizing the role of collisions and momentum in the context of kinetic theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether Dalton's law is an approximation or an exact law for ideal gases. There is no consensus on the nature of the law, as some argue for its approximation status while others suggest it may be exact under certain conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of their understanding of kinetic theory and the assumptions involved in applying Dalton's law, particularly regarding the interactions between gas molecules.

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
Does anyone know a rigorous proof for Dalton's law ? I think I saw it once, but I can not find it again anywhere.

Thanks
Ric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dalton's "law" is not a real law but only an approximation. In the case of ordinary gases, the molecules or atoms do not collide very often, and the partial pressures add (as I am sure you know). It can be derived by neglecting the forces between these particles, and the volume occupied by them. A paragraph about it can be found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalton's_law

You can start with a discussion of the kinetic theory of gases. I just read about it in Halliday, Resnick and Walker's "Fundamentals of Physics", fifth edition. They assume that the particles do not collide with one another, but only with the walls of whatever contains them. They derive an expression for the pressure based on the number of particles per unit volume and their average speed. Although they do not explicitly treat the case where the gas is a mixture, the concept can be extended to that case.

I hope that helps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
Wikipedia only says the total pressure for a mixture of gases can be expressed as ##p_{tot} = \sum p_i##, but it doesn't say why.

I do not know very much about kinetic theory of gasses, but if you say the answer lies there, then I'll study it. :wink::biggrin:
 
dRic2 said:
Wikipedia only says the total pressure for a mixture of gases can be expressed as ##p_{tot} = \sum p_i##, but it doesn't say why.
Because there is so little interaction of any type between the gas molecules that the forces from each can just be added together for a good approximation. So the pressures are added to get a total pressure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
FactChecker said:
good approximation
Yes, but I remember that, for ideal gasses, it not an approximation. Maybe it just comes from the fact that ideal gasses are supposed to have no interaction between their molecules, but I remember my professor showed this with math... Maybe I remember wrong.
 
dRic2 said:
Yes, but I remember that, for ideal gasses, it not an approximation. Maybe it just comes from the fact that ideal gasses are supposed to have no interaction between their molecules, but I remember my professor showed this with math... Maybe I remember wrong.
I just said "good approximation" out of an over-abundance of caution. It's probably good enough to be called exact. Yes, the assumption of no interaction is key.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
FactChecker said:
So the pressures are added to get a total pressure.
A very noddy way of looking at the way pressures can add up would be to consider several small people banging against a wall with hammers. The effect of this (including the rate of hammering) is a pressure. Then take several larger people with bigger hammers, also banging on the wall. They will also have the effect of pressure and the two will just add together.
Instead of people, imagine large and small ballbearings in a steel box, all hitting the wall and bouncing against each other occasionally. The ball / ball collisions make no difference to the total momentum in the direction of the wall and you can think in terms of the frequency of collisions of the big balls and small balls against the wall. Collisions between big and small balls will even out the distribution of Kinetic energies of the balls (corresponding to the temperature in the gas) and the pressure on a wall will be the sum of the pressures (rate of collisions times average momentum). If you were to have just small balls in the box (same number), with the same mean speed (aka temperature) the pressure against the wall will be the same as the contribution of the small balls when they are part of the mixture. Ditto for the big balls.
That's just Kinetic Theory put into everyday words.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and dRic2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K