Damn you Ivan, Damn you all to hell

  • Thread starter Thread starter tribdog
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the closure of a thread on Mars methane, which led to frustration due to the lack of relevant links provided for further commentary. The user expresses a desire to maintain a specific post count that aligns with scientific constants, mentioning numbers like Planck's constant and palindromes related to pi. There is also confusion regarding a video link that appears to have changed, prompting the user to consider unlocking their original thread for further discussion.
tribdog
Messages
768
Reaction score
17
I wanted to comment on your Mars Methane thread, but you closed it and linked to a thread that has nothing to do with Mars methane. Now if I want to comment on it I have to leave GD, which will cause my post count to go up and I'll no longer be pointlessly stuck on pi. So my question is how many comments will I have to make to get to a post count that resembles a scientificky number?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
413 for Plancks constant? (4.135 667 33 x 10-15 eV s ) and also a palindrome for pi (ip)
 
You can stop at 316 and pretend its a square root of 10.
 
Hmmmm, the video in the linked post was the same one linked in the news story in my thread, but now it's not. I don't know what happened there but I'll unlock my thread.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top