Damping ratio from transfer function

AI Thread Summary
The transfer function presented is 23.23*s + 1.421 over s^2 + 25.88*s + 1.421. Concerns arise regarding the non-zero coefficient for "s" in the numerator when calculating the damping ratio using the formula 25.88 = 2 * zeta * omega. There is a suggestion to simplify the transfer function by dividing both the numerator and denominator by 23.23 to eliminate the unwanted coefficient. It is noted that while the numerator coefficients determine the system's zeros, the denominator coefficients dictate the poles, which influence the system's response characteristics. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing system behavior in control theory.
sgsawant
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I have a transfer function for system.

23.23*s + 1.421
------------------------------------- = tf
s^2 + 25.88*s + 1.421


Since the numerator has a non-zero coefficient for "s" I am wary about equating

25.88 = 2 * zeta * omega [the stuff we usually do for calculating the damping ratio].


Can someone shed any light on this?

Regards,

-sgsawant

N.B.: I this question is a copy of the one I asked on the General Forum. I wanted to switch it from General to Classical but couldn't find a way. Please guide if you know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you divide top and bottom on the left side of the equation by 23.23 to get rid of the unwanted coefficient??
 
I believe that damping ratio is found in the same way. The numerator coefficients set the system zeros, but the denominator coefficients set the poles which control the character of the response (overdamped, underdamped or critically damped).
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top