Dark matter distribution around black holes.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on methods to determine dark matter distribution around a galaxy's central black hole, emphasizing the importance of understanding dark matter's nature and interactions. It suggests examining stellar motion near the black hole as a way to gather data on dark matter distribution, while cautioning against using NFW halo models due to their tendency to suggest infinite density at the center. The conversation highlights that cosmological density profiles like NFW and Einasto are based on large-scale structures and may not accurately represent the area around black holes. Participants note the need for careful consideration of the limitations of current models when studying these regions. Overall, the complexity of dark matter distribution in relation to black holes is underscored.
majormuss
Messages
124
Reaction score
4
For my research on astrophysics for the summer, a professor gave me this assignment but I don't know where to start. The question is: What methods could be used to find the dark matter distribution around a galaxy's central black hole?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Perhaps start by researching how one determines dark matter distribution around a galaxy and extrapolate downward :)
 
I'm thinking the question may be designed to determine your (and our) understanding of the nature of Dark Matter and it's interactions. Ask yourself if we know if Black Holes make any or any substantial difference to Dark Matter and it's distribution. In fact, what does seem to affect it's distribution? Is there any relationship from which to extrapolate?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
rexregisanimi said:
Perhaps start by researching how one determines dark matter distribution around a galaxy and extrapolate downward :)
That's not a good idea. If you do that for, say, an NFW halo you get towards infinite density at the centre.

If you are referring to the black hole at the centre of our galaxy, there are stars that can be used as tracers of potential and thus could get you a dark matter distribution. However, there is a slight snag to doing that, which I will leave you to figure out :-)
 
EdgePenguin said:
That's not a good idea. If you do that for, say, an NFW halo you get towards infinite density at the centre.


I was referring to examining stellar motion in the central parts of the galaxy. Examining the motion of stars in orbit around the central black hole and noting deviations, etc. should provide a start in getting the needed information...

Do the NFW equations diverge when integrated from r=0 to some positive value? It's something like 1/r^3, correct? Shouldn't that converge? ...It has been a while for me :)
 
Yes you do get finite masses integrating the NFW halo from r=0 due to the r^2 factor in the integral element. It's still not a good idea to use it near the central black hole.

Cosmological density profiles like NFW or Einasto (which is popular in N body simulations these days) are based on large scale structure and the region immediately around the black hole is not even slightly resolved.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top