A year ago we had a HW problem about galactic rotation curves:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If the dark matter density is

[tex] \rho= \frac{\rho_0}{1+\left(\frac{r}{r_0}\right)^2}[/tex],

Then how does velocity depend radius at large r ([itex] r>>r_o[/itex])?

You want to use the virial theorem here, so you calculate M(r) and then finally calculate the potential:

[tex] \phi(r)=\int_{-\infty}^{r} \frac{k}{s}ds=\infty[/tex]

with k = constant.

Oops, phi(r) diverges logarithmically. Oh well, you just have to set the zero point somewhere else besides infinity, say at [itex] a > r_0 [/itex], so we get,

[tex] \phi(r)=k\ln{\frac{r}{a}}[/tex]

Now, since the force between any two particles is an inverse square law, the virial theorem says:

[itex] 2KE+PE=0 [/itex]. Thus we can write:

[tex] v=\sqrt{-\phi(r)} =\sqrt{ -k\ln{\frac{r}{a}}} [/tex].

Obviously, something is wrong with this answer. An observable quantity like the velocity, ‘v’, cannot depend on an arbitrarily chosen constant, ‘a’. Where did my logic go south?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dark Matter Halo + Virial theorem Q.

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**