Dark Matter Spin: Is WIMP DM Different?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of dark matter (DM) particles, specifically WIMPs, having different spins (1/2 vs. 1) and their testable predictions. It is noted that if WIMPs are spin-1/2, the Pauli exclusion principle could lead to degenerate DM clouds, but the diffuse nature of DM makes this effect negligible. The conversation highlights that while WIMPs can theoretically be light enough for degeneration, they cannot be arbitrarily light without contradicting the cold dark matter model. Observational data impose limits on the velocities and mass of WIMPs, suggesting that lighter WIMPs would disrupt large-scale structure formation. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the need for precise understanding of the mass and temperature of WIMPs to align with current observations.
Dmitry67
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
1
Are there any different testable predictions of the DM (WIMPs) having different spin: 1/2 or 1?

For example, if DM is *matter* (spin=1/2) then Pauli princliple can make dense DM cloulds 'degenerate', creating an additional pressure, even WIMPs don't interact with themselves.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
DM clouds are far, far, far too diffuse for Pauli blocking to have an effect.
 
1. So we can't tell WIMPs with spin=1/2 from WIMPs with spin=1?
2. Too diffuse? Degeneration depends on the concentration of particles (N of particles per volume), not density. No matter how they are diffuse WIMPs can be light enough so degeneration takes place. What are the current lower and upper limits for the rest mass of a single WIMP particle?
 
No, you can't make a WIMP arbitrarily light. Then you have hot dark matter, and we know dark matter is cold.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
No, you can't make a WIMP arbitrarily light. Then you have hot dark matter, and we know dark matter is cold.

I don't follow this line of logic. For the same energy you would have higher velocities, but still it is at the same energy, so the same temperature. What factors are you taking into consideration when you state that the temperature would be higher just because of a lower mass per particle?
 
He probably meant 'if WIPMs were very light they will be moving too fast and they would escape from the galaxies'

This is correct, but it means that the DM we know upper limits of VELOCITY. If we assume that WIPMs have some particular mass, we get the temperture. If we define the temperature, we get the lower limit for the mass.

But we don't know neither temperature nor mass alone
 
Well, actually what I meant was that you don't get the large scale structure right. But whatever. The point is that uber-light WIMPS are not consistent with observation.
 
Dmitry67 said:
2. Too diffuse? Degeneration depends on the concentration of particles (N of particles per volume), not density. No matter how they are diffuse WIMPs can be light enough so degeneration takes place. What are the current lower and upper limits for the rest mass of a single WIMP particle?

I don't recall off hand what the limits are for the mass of a WIMP, but I do recall that if they were light enough so that Pauli exclusion were to have an impact, then they would be light enough to have high enough velocities to smear out large scale structure. If WIMP's were light and high temperature, then the it would be like throwing an snowflake in boiling water. You wouldn't get any large scale structure at all.
 
So the observational data put some limits on v<vmax
As T is proportional to mv^2, we have upper bound for T/m
Are there any other upper/lower limits for T and m?
 
Back
Top