DCQE Question on Purpose of Glan Thompson Prisms

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel29209
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    dcqe
daniel29209
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question regarding Kim et al DCQE experiment: http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9903047v1 (also found at wikipedia.org). I have seen a number of (very) different schematics of the experiment. The best one reviewed by Dr. Kim is at: bottomlayer.com/bottom/kim-scully/kim-scully-web.htm However, I still do not get the Glan Thompson Prism (Prisms? I have seen both one or two in schematics). In the original paper the authors say, "A Glen-Thompson prism is used to split the orthogonally polarized signal and idler." Is this to say that all the "signal" photons are of the same polarization as are all the "idler" That is to say, are all the photons in the signal path "p" polarization, and all the idler path "s" polarization?
P.S. Is there a photo of the original experiment anywhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to these forums.

daniel29209 said:
The best one reviewed by Dr. Kim is at: bottomlayer.com/bottom/kim-scully/kim-scully-web.htm

Be careful with that site. Many of the claims there are quite off the track.

daniel29209 said:
However, I still do not get the Glan Thompson Prism (Prisms? I have seen both one or two in schematics). In the original paper the authors say, "A Glen-Thompson prism is used to split the orthogonally polarized signal and idler." Is this to say that all the "signal" photons are of the same polarization as are all the "idler" That is to say, are all the photons in the signal path "p" polarization, and all the idler path "s" polarization?

In type II phase matching the two emitted photons have different polarizations. The Glen-Thompson prism is just a polarizing beam splitter which sends photons of one polarization one way and photons of the other polarization the other direction. Therefore the GT-prism causes spatial separation of the two polarizations and "divides" the photons into signal photons going one way and idler photons going the other way.

daniel29209 said:
P.S. Is there a photo of the original experiment anywhere?

I am not aware of one.
 
Thanks that helps...
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top