DE problem, can it be that easy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter somebodyelse5
  • Start date Start date
somebodyelse5
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is the problem. Is it as easy as my attempted solution? I think its more difficult but I am completely lost.

Picture11.png



The Attempt at a Solution



simply integrate 1/.8S dS = 1 dt
use 2009 as start time so t=0 and S=.6 to solve for C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, the price of sand has nothing to do with the price of glass so you are right. You can solve it that way. On the other hand it looks to me like the question isn't asking to you solve the equation. It's asking for an estimate of the solution using 'linearity principals'. That's different from solving. Are there more parts? They must have a question having something to do with glass later on, given the elaborate set up.
 
Dick said:
Sure, the price of sand has nothing to do with the price of glass so you are right. You can solve it that way. On the other hand it looks to me like the question isn't asking to you solve the equation. It's asking for an estimate of the solution using 'linearity principals'. That's different from solving. Are there more parts? They must have a question having something to do with glass later on, given the elaborate set up.

nope, that's it, I scanned everything involved. this is the last problem.

I would guess linearity, but we covered it for like 20 minutes and moved on. If I were to use linearity, where would I start?
 
You know dS/dt and S in 2009. The only linearity principal that comes to mind is to use that slope to extrapolate along a straight line to 2011. That gives you a pretty poor estimate of the actual solution you would get solving the ODE. And the reason why it's poor has nothing to do with the extraneous 'glass' stuff. It's just that the function isn't very closely approximated by a linear function. I really don't get what this question's point is. Maybe you should just solve the ODE and give that answer.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top