News Debate between Third Party candidates

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pythagorean
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Larry King is set to moderate a third-party presidential debate on October 23, 2012, in Chicago, featuring candidates Gary Johnson and Jill Stein. This debate will not include major party candidates President Obama or Governor Romney and will be streamed online via Ora.TV and broadcast on channels like Link TV and Al Jazeera English. The discussion raises questions about the exclusion of third-party candidates from mainstream debates, suggesting that their presence could challenge the consensus between Democrats and Republicans on various issues. Some participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of third-party candidates, viewing them as potentially disruptive or less serious. Comparisons are made to political debates in Canada, where candidates engage more vigorously on policy platforms. Overall, the conversation reflects a desire for broader political discourse beyond the two-party system in the U.S.
Pythagorean
Science Advisor
Messages
4,416
Reaction score
327
Listening now... will comment later

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Larry King to moderate third-party debate on Oct. 23

Former CNN host Larry King will moderate a debate between third-party candidates in Chicago coming up on Tuesday, October 23, 2012. This debate will not include President Obama or Governor Romney but it will be available streamed online as well as broadcast live on a few cable channels.

Air Time: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 at 9pm et

Live Stream: Ora.TV (Oct 23, 2012)

TV Channels: Link TV, Al Jazeera English, RT America
 
Third-party presidential debate? I like Gary Johnson and Jill Stein, but come on.

I'm curious as to why the third-party candidates aren't allowed to debate with democrats and republicans?
 
what do you mean, "come on?". I think it's good to challenge stuff that the Republocrats agree on. Don't get me wrong, they come of as amateurs much of the time, so I don't really take either party seriously as a presidential candidate, but I think they're very well equipped to challenge issues that the Democrats and Republicans can safely hide behind together (stuff that will never come up in the Republocrat debates).

I'm guessing they're nto allowed in for the same reason. They disagree with issues that Democrats and Republicans would stand together on. It's possible that they're suspecte of being disruptive or rabble-rousing, too. Or maybe even a riot risk; there's some times between Green party and Occupy Wallstreet: they explciitly support it:

http://www.gp.org/campaigns/occupy-america/index.php
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mentalist said:
I'm curious as to why the third-party candidates aren't allowed to debate with democrats and republicans?
The major candidates see no upside, so they choose not to do it.
 
However, it couldn't be worse than a republocrat debate.

In Quebec and Canada (at the federal level), political candidates may scream at each other during debates but at least they are screaming about platforms and their effects.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
So... did anyone watch?

I did not.


next.
 
Catria said:
However, it couldn't be worse than a republocrat debate.

In Quebec and Canada (at the federal level), political candidates may scream at each other during debates but at least they are screaming about platforms and their effects.


these are Americans my friend.

They don't know about or care about Canadian politics. As seen in the third debate.


They will get their pipeline with or without our approval. ( As per Romney )
 

Similar threads

Replies
51
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top