B DeBroglie Wavelength with Relativistic Electron

Oaxaca
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find the DeBroglie wavelength of an electron moving at .8c. I have never learned special relativity but I believe the momentum is affected (mass change). I used the formula p= (mv)/(1-v^2/c^2) and got a momentum of p = 2.733 E-22 and a wavelength of lamda = 2.4149 E-12. Did I apply the formula correctly for the relativistic momentum?

Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neither ##p=2.733\times{10}^{-22}## grain-furlongs per fortnight nor ##\lambda=2.4149\times{10}^{-12}## parsecs would be correct, but I'm pretty sure you didn't use those units. What units did you use?

The ##m## in the formula you cite is the rest mass, not the relativistic mass (and we have a FAQ on why relativistic mass is seldom used - look for a link to it in the sticky thread at the top of this forum). As long as you get that right and pay attention to the units, you should come to the right answer.
 
Nugatory said:
Neither ##p=2.733\times{10}^{-22}## grain-furlongs per fortnight nor ##\lambda=2.4149\times{10}^{-12}## parsecs would be correct, but I'm pretty sure you didn't use those units. What units did you use?

The ##m## in the formula you cite is the rest mass, not the relativistic mass (and we have a FAQ on why relativistic mass is seldom used - look for a link to it in the sticky thread at the top of this forum). As long as you get that right and pay attention to the units, you should come to the right answer.
I used kg and m/s for the electron, with momentum therefor being kg*m/s - and meters for my wavelength. Thanks for the response!
 
The correct formula is
$$\vec{p}=\frac{m \vec{v}}{\sqrt{1-\vec{v}^2/c^2}}.$$
I'm to lazy to check your formula with quantities given in SI units which are not very intuitive to use in high-energy physics and thus why I've never seen anybody using them there in scientific work in this field ;-)).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top