Decaying signal resonator power

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the reflected power of a resonator at 10.64GHz for wireless applications. The user encounters issues with power readings that vary significantly based on the FFT windowing technique used, with enlarging the window resulting in a decrease of 3-5dBm in power measurements. Suggestions include using a directional coupler in reverse or a network analyzer to monitor reflected power, but challenges remain due to the presence of both resonator response and interrogation pulse in the reflected signal. The user seeks a reliable methodology for consistent measurements across multiple resonator designs. The conversation highlights the need for effective windowing techniques to achieve accurate reflected power assessments.
lukacsmw
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am measuring the reflected power of a resonator for potential wireless applications. I'm pulsing the resonator with a 10.64GHz (resonate freq) pulsed waveform (10ns pulse width, 200ns period). Use an oscilloscope, it's easy to see the reflected pulse - with a maximum voltage just after the 10ns incident pulse. I've gated out the incident pulse and performed an FFT in Matlab to determine the power of the return pulse. The problem is that the power very much depends on the windowing of my FFT. As I enlarge the window, the power decreases by as much as 3-5dBm. From a practical perspective, what would be the best way to determine the reflected power of the signal?

I thought about taking an FFT using ever decreasing windowing, plotting the data and determining an intercept which would be the theoretical maximum power output - but I don't see that being very practical.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
From a practical perspective, what would be the best way to determine the reflected power of the signal?

Connect a directional coupler in reverse, and monitor the reflected power with a power meter, or a spectrum analyzer.

Or do a sweep with a network analyzer.
 
I thought about the directional coupler in reverse. I'm actually using a circulator - but it accomplishes the same thing. The problem is that my reflected pulse contains both the resonator response and the reflected interrogation pulse. The resonator only absorbs about 4-5dB at the resonate frequency, so I'm still receiving a return interrogation pulse. The spectrum Analyzers I'm familiar with do not have the capability to remove that reflected pulse and determine the power of just the resonate response.

When I try to do so with an oscilloscope using the gating function to isolate only the resonate response, then I have the issue describe above where the power level drops as I enlarge the gating window to encompass more of the response.
 
What kind of window are you using?
Somewhere at work I have a long review article about various windowing functions, when to use which window etc, if you want I can try to find it on Monday.
 
The article on windowing functions sounds great - if you can find that article that would be greatly appreciated. I've implemented the window two ways, first using the mathematical gating function of my DPO7000 series oscilloscope, second just dumping the data into MATLAB and deleted the data points outside the window.

Both result in the same problem that the magnitude of the spectral response decreases as the windowing increases - meaning that I don't have a reliable, repeatable measure of the reflected power. I'm going to be taking several dozen measurements of some new resonator designs, and I need a repeatable methodology for reflected power.

Thanks!
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
9K
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top