Deciphering the Function of Old Power Station Equipment

  • Thread starter Thread starter sophiecentaur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equipment Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two displays from an old power station, particularly a Frequency Meter that operates on the resonance of vibrating reeds. Participants explore the possibility of building a low-cost electrical frequency meter, noting the reliability and simplicity of analog devices compared to modern electronic systems. The conversation highlights the advantages of the KISS principle in engineering, emphasizing that analog meters are less prone to failure and easier to maintain. There is also a humorous exchange about confusion between frequency and RPM measurements. Overall, the reliability of analog systems in critical applications is underscored.
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
30,060
Reaction score
7,373
I saw these two displays in Poole Town Museum. They came from the old local power station.
The Frequency Meter appealed to me. I assume it works on the resonance of vibrating reeds and the white end(s) of the reeds at or near resonance will vibrate but the others will not.
I'm sure Jim will like these, even if they don't appeal to anyone else. :smile:
 

Attachments

  • CEGB 1.jpg
    CEGB 1.jpg
    39.5 KB · Views: 505
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    51.6 KB · Views: 492
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hmm, could it be possible to build an electrical frequency meter like that for a low cost?
 
A bit labour intensive, I would think. (Of course, you have one of those in your ear!)
 
sophiecentaur said:
I saw these two displays in Poole Town Museum. They came from the old local power station.
The Frequency Meter appealed to me. I assume it works on the resonance of vibrating reeds and the white end(s) of the reeds at or near resonance will vibrate but the others will not.
I'm sure Jim will like these, even if they don't appeal to anyone else. :smile:
I think you wrote what's in bold just to get my reaction. :biggrin:
 
Sure, and computer soundcard; but for frequencies above 20kHz that would be nice with even +-1000 Hz accuracy. Ill check the old journals at uni library for something like it...
 
Dang Sophi. I was going to say ... don't talk too loud else Don will hear you and will want them :wink:

but its too late, he's already heard haha

Dave
 
but that meter is reading flow rates and RPM, not frequency
 
That's an interesting meter : 1% resolution. i never saw one with so many reeds.

At first the 3000 rpm midscale threw me - but of course it is, you're 50 hz.

There's a lot fewer ways for that one to fail than in a fancy electronic one.

We kept one with a magnetic mount on our turbine front casing. It had no wires - needs no voltage since vibration from the machine is plenty to excite the reeds. Always check the electronic meter against that one before starting any test. Our overspeed trip was set at 111% which would be 3330 for 50hz... on your meter bottom row fourth reed . Ours was 60hz 4 pole, 111%=1998 RPM.

The reeds adjacent will indeed vibrate but at less amplitude. So you get an eye shaped display centered on correct frequency.



Thanks Sophie !
 
davenn said:
but that meter is reading flow rates and RPM, not frequency

Tut Tit. Read what it says on the tin, dear boy. The label is for three exhibits - and the gauge is marked in RPM. :biggrin:
 
  • #10
Most engineers enthusiastically subscribe to the KISS principle; but they repeatedly forget to apply it in real life.

That RPM meter illustrates the KISS principle. Not only that, it is highly reliable and redundant. Even if one of the reeds breaks, that does not affect the others. It is easy to protect from over/under voltage or frequency or G forces, cyber attack, and so on. Watching the meter, the operator can not only see the current RPM, but the trend and (within a certain band) the noise levels of the signal.

I recently visited a brand new ultra-modern regional control room for the US power grid. It made use of countless computers, video screens, and a 150x50 foot video wall. Yet the backup of the backup is still a bunch of analog recorders and simple analog devices, wired to remote analog sensors scattered around the region, and wired back to the center with dedicated analog copper wires. One signal, one wire for hundreds of miles and supposedly following diverse routing paths.

When the consequences of complete failure are intolerable, the KISS principle prevails.
 
  • #11
mishima said:
Hmm, could it be possible to build an electrical frequency meter like that for a low cost?

Did you look at what's available on the better class of DMMs? Crude RC based measurement, I think but much better than nothing.
 
  • #12
Yet the backup of the backup is still a bunch of analog recorders and simple analog devices, wired to remote analog sensors scattered around the region, and wired back to the center with dedicated analog copper wires.

Ours was an old plant, completely analog.
Actually those three black controllers immediately below operator's hand are pneumatic. Old fashioned, but completely immune to RFI and Stuxnet.

TerryJones11_12_170_2-09042012-10000925A_zpsf6cf32ce.jpg

photo courtesy of argental...

That's a good combination - a robust analog system with a sophisticated computer to monitor and troubleshoot it . Our analog equipment outlasted four generations of computers.

I repaired computers long enough to appreciate their failure modes. Hence my signature.

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog
  • #13
sophiecentaur said:
Tut Tit. Read what it says on the tin, dear boy. The label is for three exhibits - and the gauge is marked in RPM. :biggrin:

I don't follow ??

ohhh you were referring to a freq meter (that wasn't in the pic) but showing a rev counter :redface:
that's a great way to confuse this poor ol' fart haha
D
 
  • #14
NOOO, Not the RED Button ... Don't push the red button !

attachment.php?attachmentid=72559&stc=1&d=1409358791.jpg



Sorry Jim ... my nutty sense of humour ... I couldn't resist ! :smile:


Dave
 

Attachments

  • TerryJones.jpg
    TerryJones.jpg
    77.8 KB · Views: 531
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #15
davenn said:
I don't follow ??

ohhh you were referring to a freq meter (that wasn't in the pic) but showing a rev counter :redface:
that's a great way to confuse this poor ol' fart haha



D

I see the confusion. Well, the meter measures frequency and my Electronics Engineer brain made me write that down and not RPM indicator. Still a damn clever 'little' engine.
 
Back
Top