Decoding Art: Understanding the Transformation from Painting to Integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter nhrock3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical transformation of painting into integral forms, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding the notation and concepts involved. Key terms such as "ds" and "rd(phy)" are highlighted, indicating a need for clarity in their definitions. Participants suggest that the topic may be better suited for advanced physics forums due to its reliance on multivariable calculus and standard electrodynamics principles. The importance of providing a clear problem description is emphasized to facilitate understanding among newcomers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Multivariable calculus concepts
  • Understanding of integrals in mathematical physics
  • Familiarity with standard electrodynamics
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the definition and application of "ds" in calculus
  • Explore the concept of "rd(phy)" in the context of integrals
  • Study multivariable calculus techniques for transforming functions
  • Investigate advanced physics forums for discussions on electrodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics and physics, particularly those interested in the application of calculus to physical theories and transformations.

nhrock3
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
dont be scared look at it from mathematical point of view

i just want to understand how they transform the painting to the integral

cant understand what is ds
and why it equals rd(phy)

maybe the confused phu with teta(cause i don't see phi)
i still can't see what that means
?

2ug28nn.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
why don't you give the problem description with all related info

if you want the best chance of a reply, you should try and make it as easy as possible for people with fresh eyes to interpret

Also whilst the integrals use multivariable calculus, this is probably better off in the adv. physics forums as it look to be standard electrodynamics
 

Similar threads

Calculate surface integral on sphere
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Symmetry of an Integral of a Dot product
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Fourier Transform - Solutions Error?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Stokes' Theorem 'corollary' integral in cylindrical polar coordinates
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
A line integral about a closed "unit triangle" around the origin
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Undergrad Calculating the surface area of a sphere using dA
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
Graduate Vanishing of an integral of a divergence over a closed surface
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Quantum theory, show variation of S zero, integrate by parts
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
How to set bounds in cylindrical coordinates analytically?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Understanding the LaPlace Transformation for Solving Complex Integrals
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K