Decreasing the distance between the wave sources....

AI Thread Summary
Decreasing the distance between two wave sources will enlarge the interference pattern, resulting in larger diffraction and greater angles between nodal lines. This change also leads to a decrease in the wavelength of the resulting waves. The discussion highlights the challenge of visualizing these concepts, with participants expressing a desire for simulations to better understand the effects. Confidence in the correctness of the answer varies among contributors, with some affirming that a decrease in distance correlates with a decrease in wavelength. Overall, the conversation centers on clarifying the impact of source distance on wave interference patterns.
LionLieOn
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Imagine a interference pattern like the common water-wave interference pattern.

What effect would decreasing the distance between the 2 wave sources have on the interference pattern?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


A change in the distance between the two sources will also alter the number of lines. When the distance is decreased between the wave sources the interference pattern will become larger ( larger diffraction ) and the angles between the nodal lines would become greater, and the wavelength of the resulting waves would also decrease.

I'm not very confident in my answer. I tried to visualize this in my mind but it was difficult. I tried to look for some ripple simulations to help me but I couldn't find one.

Is my answer correct? I tried to visualize it but I just couldn't. I just took examples from my book and compared them.

I'm I missing anything important or am I wrong? Thank you in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are correct i.e. the wavelength will decrease.
If they are brought closer then the distance will decrease and so, perhaps the wavelength will decrease.
Mind you, this is only a supposition.
 
Hmm is there anything else I can add/ know of a simulator that can prove my statement?

Sorry I'm a bit of perfectionist.

Thank you for the help too.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top