Defensive Driving: Reduce Impact Force in Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ulnarian
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In urban driving, merging vehicles often pose a collision risk, particularly during rush hour. To minimize impact force if a collision is unavoidable, slowing down as much as possible is recommended to reduce energy and momentum. Ideally, moving away from the merging vehicle in the same direction can also lessen damage, but this may lead to risks with other road users. The UK law suggests increasing the gap to ensure safe stopping distances when cut off. Ultimately, emergency braking is the most effective strategy for minimizing damage and legal issues in such scenarios.
Ulnarian
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Living in the city, it seems that some jerk tries to merge right into my car on a daily basis during rush hour (i.e. they try to come into my lane without even looking if I'm there or not).

Assuming that avoiding a collision isn't possible, what is the best way to reduce the amount of force of the impact? Do I slow my car down as much as possible? Do I speed up my car to match the velocity of the other car? Any ideas?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Slow down as much as you can, reduce the overall energy and momentum of the collision.
 
A way to reduce impact would to be ideally move away from the merging car in the same direction so that less damage occurs.
 
joshmdmd said:
A way to reduce impact would to be ideally move away from the merging car in the same direction so that less damage occurs.

But then you risk collision with other road users or shortening your own stopping time if someone else does something.

The law (in the UK, which I happen to agree with) says that when you have someone cut in in front or behind you, you should increase the gap between you and the car in front to ensure you have a safe stopping distance. Not that you should accelerate, swerve etc out of the way.

Note, I can understand accelerating away if the road is clear (seems the obvious choice), but I assumed this was during traffic.
 
In traffic, trying to slow down as rapidly as possible is your best choice. Given short reaction time, if your car has ABS, just slam the brakes. Pretty much all you can do. If you have no ABS, then application of brakes is the matter of surface conditions. On fresh snow, slamming the brakes is the worst thing you can do with no ABS. But hopefully, you know how to perform proper emergency braking on your car. If not, it's a good idea to find an empty parking lot and practice.

Unfortunately, very often, not hitting the guy who cut you off means getting hit by the guy who's been tailgating you. On the plus side, the later is the fault of the person behind you, regardless of whether you can prove that the guy in front of you cut you off. In most places, if both collisions happen anyways, it's still the fault of the guy in the rearmost car. So emergency braking is your best bet both in terms of minimizing damage and in minimizing legal troubles.
 
Ulnarian said:
Assuming that avoiding a collision isn't possible, what is the best way to reduce the amount of force of the impact? Do I slow my car down as much as possible? Do I speed up my car to match the velocity of the other car?
It's not clear to me how avoiding impact isn't possible if the other car is moving faster than you. If it's moving faster than you and merging into your lane at the same time, it would have to have started the lane change almost behind you in order for mild braking on your part to not avoid the collision.

As far as reducing the force of impact from a collision, you want to match the other cars velocity, both the speed and direction, assuming this doesn't result in hitting other surrounding cars or objects.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top