Defining Real Numbers Between Two Integers

Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
If we were to take any two integers on a real number line and mark a point (a number) halfway between the two, do the same in the range between the halfway point and each of the two numbers, and continue the process, would we be able to define all real numbers between the two integers (including irrational numbers) as the limit of a rational expression or a series of rational expressions?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think not. Because whatever you define would not be countable.
 
Consider in between 0 and 1. You'll end up getting every rational number that has a 2^k in the denominator. These points are dense, so every number between 0 and 1 is a limit of a sequence of them. Then given any two integers a and b, the map f(t)=a(1-t)+bt is a bijection between the intervals [0,1] and [a,b] that preserves your construction (so 1/2 is mapped to halfway between a and b, 1/4 is mapped to one quarter of the way between a and b) and so your construction is dense on any interval between two integers
 
I think the answer is no because the halfway point between any two rational numbers is another rational number. You can't obtain irrational numbers using this method.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top