Definite Integration by Substitution

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
theRukus
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[itex]\int^2_1 6x\sqrt{x-1}dx[/itex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Let [itex]u=x-1[/itex].
Then, [itex]u+1=x[/itex],
and [itex]du=dx[/itex].

Continued from problem statement,
[itex]=6 \int^1_0 (u+1)u^{\frac{1}{2}}du[/itex]
[itex]=6 \int^1_0 u^{\frac{3}{2}} + u^{\frac{1}{2}}du[/itex]
[itex]=6(1^{\frac{3}{2}} + 1^{\frac{1}{2}})[/itex]
[itex]=6(2)[/itex]
[itex]=12[/itex]

My Web submission program (for University) has told me this is wrong.

What am I doing wrong?

Thank you for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you have to put x-1 back in for u after you integrate and before you solve it for the definite numbers. Also, why did you change the bounds from 1 to 2, to 0 to 1?
 
ArcanaNoir said:
you have to put x-1 back in for u after you integrate and before you solve it for the definite numbers. Also, why did you change the bounds from 1 to 2, to 0 to 1?

theRukus is doing the definite integral under a u-substitution, so the limits must be changed from x = 1 to x = 2 into u = 0 to u = 1 . That is perfectly legitimate: the problem is that the integration hasn't actually been carried out; tR just put 1 ( and 0 ) into the integrand!
 
dynamicsolo said:
theRukus is doing the definite integral under a u-substitution, so the limits must be changed from x = 1 to x = 2 into u = 0 to u = 1 . That is perfectly legitimate:

interesting! I was never taught that, so I always just used a and b temporarily until I put the original variable back in, and with it the original bounds.

Yes, integrating an integral is a good idea. (why is it so hard to see the obvious sometimes?)
 
ArcanaNoir said:
interesting! I was never taught that, so I always just used a and b temporarily until I put the original variable back in, and with it the original bounds.

Working with the transformed definite integral under transformed limits of integration* can save a bit of writing. You are basically still doing the calculations you would have done to evaluate the definite integral in x anyway, but you don't have to take the time writing out the antiderivative in x to set up the evaluation...

*Common integration error: forgetting to transform those limits... so don't forget.