Definition of the gradient operator

elgen
Messages
63
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I am curious if anyone here remembers the gradient operator by the following definition:

\nabla f = \lim_{\Delta v->0} \frac{1}{\Delta v}\oint f \vec{dS}.

So far I could find only one book that gives the definition above.

I find this definition quite nice as the expressions of the gradient operator in many coordinate systems naturally follow from this definition. Also, it is a good contrast with the definition of the divergence operator

\nabla \cdot \vec{f} = \lim_{\Delta v->0} \frac{1}{\Delta v}\oint \vec{f}\cdot \vec{dS}.

notice the change from f to \vec{f}.elgen
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I haven't seen those before. Did you mean to have \nabla f and \Delta f on the left hand sides, and \nabla f in the integrand of the second?
 
Fixed my original post. They are the definition in terms of the limit.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top