Definitive measurement that determines state of matter?

AI Thread Summary
Determining a substance's state of matter can be challenging, as definitions like "very little room between molecules" lack empirical clarity. The discussion highlights that while practical tests exist, such as pouring a substance to identify liquids or assessing structural integrity for solids, these methods can be subjective. The distinction between solid and liquid states is often blurred, especially in cases like non-Newtonian fluids or substances at critical points. The conversation emphasizes that states of matter are rough characterizations rather than strict classifications. Overall, the complexity of physical systems complicates the definitive measurement of states of matter.
curiousoldguy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What is an (the?) empirically demonstrable method used for determining a substance's state of matter?

If a new substance was discovered and scientist A said it's solid and scientist B said it's a liquid, how would it be demonstrably proven to be one or the other? The books I have define states of matter in scientifically unsatisfying terms like "if there is very little room between molecules but they can move it's a liquid": it doesn't seem testable: my definition of "very little room" might be different than yours. For example, is there a magic heat capacity that for any substance, if it's above 25 J/C it's by definition a solid? I can look-up tables of characteristics for known substances, but what about one that falls from outer space we know nothing about?

Thanks for any insight. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A substance's state of matter is just a rough characterization. Real physical systems are not always so clearly distinct to where they can be classified. For example, at the critical point and beyond the liquid and gas phases are not distinct.
 
See/Google "non-Newtonian fluids."
 
Thanks. I got the feeling they were general terms. :)
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top