I Deflect Asteroid w/ Collisions: Calculating Theta & MJ Interractions

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter dedocta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions Space
AI Thread Summary
The feasibility of deflecting an asteroid using collisions with approximately 32MJ of energy was explored, focusing on the necessary number of collisions to achieve a desired trajectory change. Calculations were based on an ideal scenario involving perpendicular collisions, leading to the formulation of an isosceles triangle to determine the angle Theta for deflection. An Excel spreadsheet was created to analyze the relationship between distance, deflection, and the number of interactions required, indicating that smaller asteroids could be deflected more effectively than larger ones like the Chicxulub asteroid. The discussion emphasized that momentum is more critical than energy in these calculations, particularly for short timescales where impact direction is less significant. For longer timescales, orbital mechanics must be considered, as the asteroid's position may revert after one orbit, influencing deflection strategies.
dedocta
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
I'm looking for a way to calculate how much an asteroids trajectory would change, based off of a collision event.
In short, I was trying to look into feasibility of deflecting an asteroid with a collision of ~32MJ of direct energy. I wanted to know how many collisions are necessary to deflect at a given time out (distance away.)

I found this link, where the collision is perpendicular to the motion of the asteroid:

https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...an-asteroid-with-force-always-perpendicular-tSo, taking the following equation, and with the ideal scenario of a perpendicular collision we are left with an isosceles triangle, where we can solve for Theta based off of the distance away of the asteroid and the distance we want to deflect / modify trajectory.

𝑚(𝑣1^2)(1−cos(𝜃))

Asteroid Deflection.jpg


I then created an excel spreadsheet to calculate theta based off of the distance away and deflection distance, and asked how many 32MJ interractions it would take to change the trajectory by a certain distance at a certain time of collision. It would appear smaller asteroids it would be possible to change trajectories with this, however, not so much for the lower and upper bounds of the Chicxilub asteroid and another larger current NEO.

Would this be an acceptable way to do this? If so, I've been stuck on where to go next if the collision is not perpendicular, if anyone had any input?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Energy is largely useless for these calculations. It is all about momentum. A more massive object with the same energy in the asteroid reference frame will have a much larger effect on the orbit.

For short timescales (short compared to an orbit) the impact direction doesn't matter that much for the calculation: You give the asteroid a velocity change v that depends on your impact only, after time t its position will have changed by v*t. For longer timescales you have to consider orbital mechanics. As an extreme case: After one orbit the object will return to where it was, no matter how the impact was (neglecting perturbations by planets or similar). It might return earlier or later, however, that can work as deflection, too.
 
  • Like
Likes dedocta
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top