Deformation Experiment: Learn about Experiment Results & Processes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a deformation experiment involving aluminum samples that were stretched and then subjected to heating and chemical treatment. The results indicate that the degree of stretching affects grain size, with more stretched samples showing smaller grains. Key processes mentioned include cold working, annealing, recrystallization, and grain growth, which are influenced by temperature and alloy composition. The possibility of some samples not being fully treated in the furnace is raised, suggesting variability in results. Resources for further reading on metallurgical topics are also provided to assist in understanding the experiment's processes.
disclaimer
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi all;

Hope it's the right place to post this, so

I am missing a report from the classes I was absent from and I can't find help anywhere... Here's the result of the experiment:

http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/5452/plasticdeformationjx8.jpg

These are thin pieces of aluminium that had been previously stretched to reach certain lengths (from shortest to longest). Basically this is all I know. I also know that they were put into an oven or furnace for some time (a bit more than 60 minutes), then they were washed in some liquid (chemical substance?), and the result was something like what you can see in the picture. The more stretched a sample was, the smaller grains we can see.

So, could someone name the processes that should take place while carrying out such an experiment? Or maybe someone could post an extensive description of a similar experiment? Help will be greatly appreciated. I'm in a tight corner now, so I am clutching at a straw. Many thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect the Al samples were etched to show up the grain boundaries.

Drawing and forging at around room temperature, i.e. cold working, increases the dislocation density in a material.

Heating in a furnace will anneal the material such that the dilocations will move and cancel, and atoms will pop back into lattice positions. In some cases, dislocation networks will form new grain boundaries in a process known as recrystallization.

Another aspect of annealing is the promotion of grain growth in which smaller grains grow to larger grains, which depends on the alloy composition, time and temperature.

Is it possible that region with small grains was not in the furnace?

Key-to-metals is a good site for references on metallurgical topics.

Heat Treatable Aluminum Alloys
http://www.key-to-metals.com/Article39.htm

Effect of Aging on Formability of Aluminum Alloys
http://www.key-to-metals.com/Article144.htm
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top