Degenerate Perturbation Theory

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying degenerate perturbation theory to a spin-1 particle in a weak magnetic field along the x direction. The Hamiltonian is perturbed using H' = γB S_x, and participants express confusion about the initial steps and the correct basis for calculations. Clarifications are sought regarding the unperturbed energy levels and the necessity of using degenerate perturbation theory when the energies differ. The conversation emphasizes understanding the mathematical framework, including matrix diagonalization and the representation of the perturbation in the appropriate basis. Overall, the thread aims to guide users through the complexities of quantum mechanics related to this problem.
TeddyYeo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have spin-1 particle in zero magnetic field.
Eigenstates and eigenvalue of operator \hat S_z is - \hbar |-1>, 0 |0>
and \hbar |+1>.

Calculate the first order of splitting which results from the application of a weak magnetic field in the x direction.

Homework Equations


Hamiltonian is perturbed by H' = \gamma B \hat S_x = - ( \gamma B/2) (\hat S_+ + \hat S_-)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
We have to solve it using degenerate perturbation theory in the basis mentioned, and check it which the basis of eigenvectors of \hat S_x.

I am really confused with quantum mechanics, thus would like to know how do we start the question.
Is there anyone that can help us by going through step by step how should we go about it and explain it as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, we don't supply solutions here. You need to show some effort in trying to figure out the problem yourself.

You already know how to start the question. As you said, you need to apply degenerate perturbation theory. This topic is surely covered in your textbook.
 
How do we apply the theory?
Do I need to assume anything?

For unperturbed,
|-1> => E^0_{-1} =-\hbar
|0&gt; =&gt; E^0_{0} = 0<br /> |+1&amp;gt; =&amp;gt; E^0_{+1} =+\hbar<br /> <br /> Correct? <br /> How do we create the new basis for the H&#039; then?
 
No, that's not correct. If the unperturbed energies are different, you don't need degenerate perturbation theory, do you?

Can you describe the general idea behind degenerate perturbation theory?
 
Is it that when we affect the system by a little, then we are to find out the how much the system changes?
And by degenerate, it means that energy eigenvalues are the same for all states it act on?
 
Yes, that's what degenerate perturbation theory is, but I want you to describe the basic idea of what you're doing when you apply the theory to a situation. In other words, what's the math problem you are solving? Are you diagonalizing a matrix? If so, what matrix? What does it represent and in what basis?
 
  • Like
Likes TeddyYeo
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top