I Degenerate Triangles: Questions & Poincaré Conjecture

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim Lundquist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangles
Jim Lundquist
Messages
38
Reaction score
1
Please forgive me...I am not a mathematician, but I have a couple questions that have been puzzling me. In theory, can a circle be so large that connecting 3 points on that circle result in a degenerate triangle? If the length of a straight line drawn between two points on a circle is Planck distance, how can another point fall between those 2 points? Do such questions cause problems using math as a descriptive tool in physics, or are there fudge factors? One more thing...does the Poincaré conjecture factor into these questions in any way? Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Jim Lundquist said:
In theory, can a circle be so large that connecting 3 points on that circle result in a degenerate triangle?
No, it can only get very close.

The Planck length has no relevance in mathematics, and even in physics it is not the "smallest step size" or anything like that.
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist
Jim Lundquist said:
If the length of a straight line drawn between two points on a circle is Planck distance, how can another point fall between those 2 points?
Points in math takes up no space. It is just a concept.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top