Delta function and derivative of function wrt itself

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expression \(\frac{\partial f(x)}{\partial f(y)} = \delta(x-y)\), which highlights the relationship between a function and its derivative with respect to itself. This expression is interpreted as being equal to 1 when \(x=y\) and 0 otherwise, establishing a broader understanding of manipulations involving the Dirac delta function. Key results are referenced, including integrals involving the delta function that reinforce its properties. The conversation concludes with a reference to Parr and Yang's work in Density Functional Theory, which provides a framework for understanding the functional derivative in this context. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the significance of the Dirac delta function in mathematical expressions and integrals.
Trave11er
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain the following profound truth: \frac {\partial f(x)}{\partial f(y)} =\delta(x-y)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The expression \dfrac{\partial f(x)}{\partial g(y)} is really just a short-hand, but there are a handful of rules about which manipulations "usually work" with the short-hand. It turns out that the convention you've named---that \dfrac{\partial f(x)}{\partial f(y)} is 1 if x=y and 0 if x\neq y---gives us a slightly broader notion of "usually".
 
When you see the Dirac delta function in action, you ought to remind yourself:
"How will this look like when I integrate the expression?"

I haven't seen the result you post before, but do remember the two following results:
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\delta{(x-y)}dx=f(y)
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(y)\delta{(x-y)}dy=f(x)
Most likely, your result follows from some clever manipulation of these two basic results.
 
Thanks for the replies.
Have found the answer in Parr and Yang's book on Density Functional Theory:
For a functional F=F[f] have
\delta F = \int \frac {\delta F} {\delta f(y)} \delta f(y) \,dy
In a special case that F=F(f), i.e. F is just some function of f it is required that:
\frac {\delta F(f(x))} {\delta f(y)} = \frac {dF}{df} \delta(x-y) in order to have:
\delta F = \int \frac {\delta F} {\delta f(y)} \delta f(y) \,dx = \frac {dF} {df} \delta f(x)
So that taking F = f, get:
\frac {\delta f(x)} {\delta f(y)} = \delta (x-y)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top