Delta Function Well and Uncertainty Principle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the expectation value for the Delta Function Well as presented in Griffiths Problem 2.25. The correct result is = (mα/ħ)², which contrasts with the initial incorrect calculation of -(ma/ħ)². The key insight involves recognizing the discontinuity in the wave function's derivative at zero, which necessitates the use of the delta function in the second derivative calculation. Incorporating the delta function correctly resolves the discrepancy in the expected value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the Delta Function Well.
  • Familiarity with Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" textbook.
  • Knowledge of expectation values and their calculation in quantum systems.
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation and piecewise functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Delta Function in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about piecewise-defined functions and their derivatives.
  • Review the concept of expectation values in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of discontinuities in wave functions on physical calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in quantum mechanics, particularly those tackling problems involving the Delta Function Well and expectation values. This discussion is also beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of wave function behavior and its mathematical implications.

dwintz02
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Delta Function Well and Uncertainty Principle

Homework Statement


Griffiths Problem 2.25.

I need to calculate < p[tex]^{2}[/tex]> for the Delta Function Well.
The answer given is:
< p[tex]^{2}[/tex]> = ([tex]m\alpha[/tex]/[tex]\hbar[/tex])^2

The wave function given by the book is:

[tex]\Psi(x,0)[/tex]=[tex]\frac{\sqrt{}m\alpha}{\hbar}[/tex] EXP([tex]^{-m\alpha|x|/\hbar^{2}}[/tex])



The Attempt at a Solution


The result I get from just calculating the expectation value is -(ma/hbar)^2. The negative from the operator is still hanging around. However, the hint given in the book specifies that the derivative of Psi has a discontinuity at zero and this affects the value of p^2 because it puts a 2nd derivative on Psi. The book says to use the result from the previous problem which is:

If a function is defined piecewise such that:

"F=1 for x>0
F=0 for x<0
And for the rare case that it matters F(0)=1/2
The result is that dF/dx equals the delta function." I don't know how to incorporate this.

What I am currently doing is plugging in the operator, breaking the integral into 2 parts, one from -[tex]\infty[/tex] to 0 and the other from 0 to +[tex]\infty[/tex]. Is this not enough? If not, how do I calculate the jump in the 2nd derivative at 0? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(d/dx)|x| = sign(x)

(d/dx)sign(x) = 2 delta(x)

You need to use these when computing derivatives of the wave function.
 
Awesome, that works out--the extra term from including those in the derivatives makes up the difference from the answer I got and the correct answer. Thanks tons!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
974
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K