Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,920
- 48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Section 10.5 : Exact Sequences - Projective, Injective and Flat Modules.
I am studying Proposition 28 (D&F pages 387 - 388)
In the latter stages of the proof of Proposition 28 we find the following statement (top of page 388):
"In general, Hom_R (R, X) \cong X, the isomorphism being given by mapping a homomorphism to its value on the element 1 \in R"
I am having some trouble in demonstrating the isomorphism involved in the relationship Hom_R (R, X) \cong X.
To demonstrate the isomorphism I proceeded as follows:
Let f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) so f,g : \ R \to X
Consider \theta \ : \ Hom_R (R,X) \to X
where \theta (f) = f(1_R)
To show \theta is a homomorphism we proceed as follows:
\theta (f + g) = (f + g)(1_R) = f(1_R) + g(1_R)
= \theta (f) + \theta (g)
and
\theta (rf) = (rf) = rf (1_R) = r \theta (f) where r \in R
Then I need to show \theta is injective and surjective.
BUT ... I am having problems in demonstrating that \theta is injective ... can someone help me with this task?Note that I suspect one would proceed as follows:
Suppose we have f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) such that:
\theta (f) = f(1_R) and \theta (g) = f(1_R)
Now we have, of course, by definition of g, that \theta (g) = g(1_R)
So f(1_R) = g(1_R) ... but how do we proceed from here to show that f = g?
Hope someone can help.
Peter
I am studying Proposition 28 (D&F pages 387 - 388)
In the latter stages of the proof of Proposition 28 we find the following statement (top of page 388):
"In general, Hom_R (R, X) \cong X, the isomorphism being given by mapping a homomorphism to its value on the element 1 \in R"
I am having some trouble in demonstrating the isomorphism involved in the relationship Hom_R (R, X) \cong X.
To demonstrate the isomorphism I proceeded as follows:
Let f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) so f,g : \ R \to X
Consider \theta \ : \ Hom_R (R,X) \to X
where \theta (f) = f(1_R)
To show \theta is a homomorphism we proceed as follows:
\theta (f + g) = (f + g)(1_R) = f(1_R) + g(1_R)
= \theta (f) + \theta (g)
and
\theta (rf) = (rf) = rf (1_R) = r \theta (f) where r \in R
Then I need to show \theta is injective and surjective.
BUT ... I am having problems in demonstrating that \theta is injective ... can someone help me with this task?Note that I suspect one would proceed as follows:
Suppose we have f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) such that:
\theta (f) = f(1_R) and \theta (g) = f(1_R)
Now we have, of course, by definition of g, that \theta (g) = g(1_R)
So f(1_R) = g(1_R) ... but how do we proceed from here to show that f = g?
Hope someone can help.
Peter