Demonstrating that a mapping is injective

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Injective Mapping
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Section 10.5 : Exact Sequences - Projective, Injective and Flat Modules.

I am studying Proposition 28 (D&F pages 387 - 388)

In the latter stages of the proof of Proposition 28 we find the following statement (top of page 388):

"In general, Hom_R (R, X) \cong X, the isomorphism being given by mapping a homomorphism to its value on the element 1 \in R"

I am having some trouble in demonstrating the isomorphism involved in the relationship Hom_R (R, X) \cong X.

To demonstrate the isomorphism I proceeded as follows:

Let f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) so f,g : \ R \to X

Consider \theta \ : \ Hom_R (R,X) \to X

where \theta (f) = f(1_R)

To show \theta is a homomorphism we proceed as follows:

\theta (f + g) = (f + g)(1_R) = f(1_R) + g(1_R)

= \theta (f) + \theta (g)

and

\theta (rf) = (rf) = rf (1_R) = r \theta (f) where r \in R

Then I need to show \theta is injective and surjective.

BUT ... I am having problems in demonstrating that \theta is injective ... can someone help me with this task?Note that I suspect one would proceed as follows:

Suppose we have f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) such that:

\theta (f) = f(1_R) and \theta (g) = f(1_R)

Now we have, of course, by definition of g, that \theta (g) = g(1_R)

So f(1_R) = g(1_R) ... but how do we proceed from here to show that f = g?

Hope someone can help.

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math Amateur said:
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Section 10.5 : Exact Sequences - Projective, Injective and Flat Modules.

I am studying Proposition 28 (D&F pages 387 - 388)

In the latter stages of the proof of Proposition 28 we find the following statement (top of page 388):

"In general, Hom_R (R, X) \cong X, the isomorphism being given by mapping a homomorphism to its value on the element 1 \in R"

I am having some trouble in demonstrating the isomorphism involved in the relationship Hom_R (R, X) \cong X.

To demonstrate the isomorphism I proceeded as follows:

Let f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) so f,g : \ R \to X

Consider \theta \ : \ Hom_R (R,X) \to X

where \theta (f) = f(1_R)

To show \theta is a homomorphism we proceed as follows:

\theta (f + g) = (f + g)(1_R) = f(1_R) + g(1_R)

= \theta (f) + \theta (g)

and

\theta (rf) = (rf) = rf (1_R) = r \theta (f) where r \in R

Then I need to show \theta is injective and surjective.

BUT ... I am having problems in demonstrating that \theta is injective ... can someone help me with this task?


Note that I suspect one would proceed as follows:

Suppose we have f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) such that:

\theta (f) = f(1_R) and \theta (g) = f(1_R)

Now we have, of course, by definition of g, that \theta (g) = g(1_R)

So f(1_R) = g(1_R) ... but how do we proceed from here to show that f = g?

You haven't yet used the fact that f and g are not arbitrary functions from R to X, but morphisms in the category of R-modules.

If f \in \mathrm{Hom}_R(X_1, X_2) then by definition f is an additive-group homomorphism which also satisfies f(rx) = rf(x) for all r \in R and all x \in X_1.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top