Density of an object in Relativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter gennarakis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Relativity
gennarakis
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
If the density of an object increases in special relativity (as mass increases and volume decreases), wouldn't we see strange phenomena as skyrockets exploding (because some materials can't sustain to much pressure)??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's only the "relativistic mass", which is similar to velocity in that it depends on your choice of reference frame, that increases...in the object's own frame its relativistic mass does not increase, and its "rest mass" (which is what physicists usually mean by 'mass') is not dependent on your choice of frame. So, the rocket won't explode or show any other odd behaviors which would be noticed by someone at rest relative to it, regardless of its velocity relative to us.
 
So the mass (and furthermore the density) can only be measured in a non relative frame of reference (as that of an accelerating one) otherwise you would never know the real mass of yours, hence the density.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top