Density of State for a two atom basis

Mattszo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a problem on my assignment in which I am required to find the specific heat of a two atom basis (diatomic) using the Debye model. My problem is coming up with the density of states for a diatomic setup in 1D.


Homework Equations



Density of state: g(w)=\frac{L}{\pi}\frac{1}{\frac{dw}{dq}} in 1D
g(w) = \frac{L}{π\upsilon_{s}} where \upsilon_{s} is speed of sound, L is a length of lattice constant in 1D
dispersion relationship w=\upsilon_{s}q in 1D


The Attempt at a Solution



My book says the Density of States equation shares properties with the monatomic setup.
I don't know if repeating the same equation is right because density of state depends on dimentionality (1D) and dispersion relation, which seem the same for monatomic and diatomic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the density of states tells you how many states there are for each of your particles to occupy. the dispersion relation in for 2 particles, has a similar form, and i believe it is for you to solve the wave equations to get the 2 dimensional dispersion relation.
as a result your group velocity vs is different than the one for the mono-atomic case. it will be a tensor in general, but you are only interested in its magnitude, and since vectors add, assuming the two particles have the same magnitude but independent wave vectors, the group velocity will be twice that of the mono-atomic case, and so the density of states will be halved.
 
I have to find it in one dimension. I tried something else and that was to take the integral g(w)dw with limits 0 to the Debye frequency and equate it to = (# of dimensions) times N where N is the number of particles in the lattice. In this case, the integral is equal to 1N.

Anyways I handed in my assignment already and I guess I will just see what the actual answer is. Thank you for the help!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top