I Density of States: 1-Dim Linear Phonons & Electrons Differences

cozycoz
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
I'm to get the density of states of 1-dim linear phonons, with N atoms. I think it's a lot similar to that of 1-dim electrons, except that two electrons are allowed to be in one state by Pauli exclusion principle. To elaborate,

##dN=\frac{dk}{\frac{2π}{a}}=\frac{a}{2π}dk## for phonons,

##dN=2⋅\frac{dk}{\frac{2π}{a}}=\frac{a}{π}dk## for electrons.

But in Kittel's solid state physics, the latter is described as a phonon case. What's wrong with my procedure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cozycoz said:
I'm to get the density of states of 1-dim linear phonons, with N atoms. I think it's a lot similar to that of 1-dim electrons, except that two electrons are allowed to be in one state by Pauli exclusion principle. To elaborate,

##dN=\frac{dk}{\frac{2π}{a}}=\frac{a}{2π}dk## for phonons,

##dN=2⋅\frac{dk}{\frac{2π}{a}}=\frac{a}{π}dk## for electrons.

But in Kittel's solid state physics, the latter is described as a phonon case. What's wrong with my procedure?
Are you sure ? My understanding is that two electrons are not allowed to be in one state by the Pauli exclusion principle
 
Mentz114 said:
Are you sure ? My understanding is that two electrons are not allowed to be in one state by the Pauli exclusion principle
?
I meant two electrons with two different spin types..up and down. That's why we should multiply 2 in electron case. What I calculated by ##\frac{dk}{\frac{2π}{a}}## is spatial part, not including spin part.
 
cozycoz said:
What's wrong with my procedure?
Hard to say if you don't post how you derived the density of states.
 
DrClaude said:
Hard to say if you don't post how you derived the density of states.
okay

I want to get how many phonon states(dN) are in [K, K+dK] in 1d K-space. For a state occupies small length ##\frac{2π}{a}## by periodic boundary condition,
##dN=\frac{dK}{\frac{2π}{a}}##.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top