Density of States: Varying Boundary Conditions

PineApple2
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Consider waves in a box. It is customary to calculate the density of states either by enforcing vanishing boundary conditions, then the wave numbers are
k=\frac{n\pi}{L} and we take only positive k,
or using periodic boundary conditions, in which case k=\frac{2n\pi}{L}
and taking all wave numbers.

My question is - why in the case of vanishing boundary conditions do we take only positive wave numbers? and why in the case of periodic boundary conditions do we take both positive and negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first case, vanishing boundary conditions, the solutions are standing waves, and the solutions for +k and -k are exactly the same. So we use just positive k to avoid counting them twice.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top