Density question - can a heavy object float in water ?

AI Thread Summary
A 100kg ball with a 1-meter diameter can float in water if its overall density, including any hollow areas, is less than that of water. The principle of buoyancy states that an object will float if it displaces more water than its weight. Even if the ball is made of steel, as long as it is hollow and its average density is lower than water, it will float. The discussion emphasizes that density is the critical factor, not just the object's mass. Thus, a heavy object can float if its density is sufficiently low.
Yoann
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Would a big ball weighing 100kg with a diameter of 1 meter float in water?

I guess my question is, no matter how heavy an object might be, as long as it is less dense than water, it will float no matter what, right? Like even if that ball were made of a thick layer of steel (a few inches), as long as it is hollow/empty on the inside (and big enough so that its density is lower than water's), it would float, wouldn't it?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as the object weighs less than the water it would displace if submerged, it will float. So yes, as long as the density of the object, including any hollow areas, is less on average than water it will float.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy
 
Boats can float and I'm pretty sure they are heavier than 100kg's
 
That's what I thought, thanks for the replies! (and the link to Wikipedia, Drakkith! It's helpful)
 
Gravitational said:
Boats can float and I'm pretty sure they are heavier than 100kg's
Okay, but a cubic meter of water is a thousand kg.

The key is the density, not the total mass. If you include the air inside the boat then it is less dense than water, therefore it floats.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top