Density question - can a heavy object float in water ?

AI Thread Summary
A 100kg ball with a 1-meter diameter can float in water if its overall density, including any hollow areas, is less than that of water. The principle of buoyancy states that an object will float if it displaces more water than its weight. Even if the ball is made of steel, as long as it is hollow and its average density is lower than water, it will float. The discussion emphasizes that density is the critical factor, not just the object's mass. Thus, a heavy object can float if its density is sufficiently low.
Yoann
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Would a big ball weighing 100kg with a diameter of 1 meter float in water?

I guess my question is, no matter how heavy an object might be, as long as it is less dense than water, it will float no matter what, right? Like even if that ball were made of a thick layer of steel (a few inches), as long as it is hollow/empty on the inside (and big enough so that its density is lower than water's), it would float, wouldn't it?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as the object weighs less than the water it would displace if submerged, it will float. So yes, as long as the density of the object, including any hollow areas, is less on average than water it will float.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy
 
Boats can float and I'm pretty sure they are heavier than 100kg's
 
That's what I thought, thanks for the replies! (and the link to Wikipedia, Drakkith! It's helpful)
 
Gravitational said:
Boats can float and I'm pretty sure they are heavier than 100kg's
Okay, but a cubic meter of water is a thousand kg.

The key is the density, not the total mass. If you include the air inside the boat then it is less dense than water, therefore it floats.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top