Dependence of damping constant on current

AI Thread Summary
The damping constant δ in an eddy current brake is proportional to the square of the current I (δ ∝ I²) due to the relationship between induced eddy currents and magnetic fields. The induced eddy voltage is proportional to the magnetic field B1, which in turn is proportional to the current I. As the eddy current increases, it generates a secondary magnetic field B2, which contributes to the braking force. The braking force is ultimately linked to the magnetic energy density in the airgap, which depends on the square of the magnetic field. This explains why δ is proportional to I² rather than just I.
PlickPlock
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Using an eddy current brake, one would expect the damping constant ##δ## to increase with the current ##I## supplied to the eddy current brake. My question is, why is ##δ## proportional to ##I^2## and not merely ##I##?

The magnitude of the eddy current is ##\frac{1}{R}\frac{dΦ}{dt}##, which is why I initially thought ##δ## was proportional to ##I##, because the induced current is proportional to ##\frac{dΦ}{dt}##.

P.S: This link http://home.uni-leipzig.de/prakphys/pdf/VersucheIPSP/Mechanics/M-17E-AUF.pdf
was what I used as reference; it stated the relation but does not seem to explain why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PlickPlock said:
why is δ proportional to I2 and not merely I?
The B1-field induced by the brake is proportional to I.
The induced eddy voltage in the disk is proportional to the B1-field.
The induced eddy current in the disk is proportional to the eddy voltage.
The induced B2-field from the disk is proportional to the eddy current.
The braking force is proportional to the magnetic energy density in the airgap = ½*B1*(B20) [ J/m3 ].

That's why.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PlickPlock
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top