I Derivation notation with capital D?

Emil_M
Messages
45
Reaction score
2
Hi, I came across a derivation notation I didn't recognize:
Let ##s## be some four-vector and ##\tau## the proper time. What is the significance of
$$\frac{Ds}{\mathrm{d}\tau}?$$

I know ##Ds## can be used to mean the Jacobian, but I've never come across the notation above. Does someone recognize it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you come across this notation? It should be explained there what is meant by the notation. If we cannot see the text we are just stabbing in the dark.
 
I came across this notation in one of my General Relativity scripts, but I checked the entire text before posting and this notation is not introduced in the script. I guess the author believes the notation is commonplace enough not to need an introduction. The only time ##D_X## was used in the context of derivations was in a prove for the linearity of covariant derivatives as an alternative symbol for ##\nabla_x##.

However, ##D## really doesn't make sense in the context of a covariant derivative here, as I wouldn't know what the operator ##\frac{D}{\mathrm{d}\tau}## means?

Specifically, the above notations appears in a chapter about Gyroscopic Precession:
48841_Screen_Shot_2018-02-15_at_14.07.04.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 48841_Screen_Shot_2018-02-15_at_14.07.04.jpg
    48841_Screen_Shot_2018-02-15_at_14.07.04.jpg
    46.6 KB · Views: 821
Ah ok, the notation is introduced three pages further down... I guess this is a just a formatting error of the author

Thanks for the help, though!
 
It is not a formatting error. It is a somewhat standard notation for the induced connection.
 
martinbn said:
It is not a formatting error. It is a somewhat standard notation for the induced connection.
Just to be a bit more specific; the derivative along a curve ##\gamma## with respect to the curve parameter, i.e.,
$$
\frac{Ds}{d\tau} = \nabla_{\dot\gamma} s = \dot x^\mu \nabla_\mu s,
$$
for the induced Levi-Civita connection.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top