Derivation of carrier density formula

McKendrigo
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

Not sure if this is in the best section, but here goes...

I'm trying to establish how a formula from a paper I have read has been derived. The formula is:

n=\frac{1}{qV} \int_0^I{\tau} dI

where n is the carrier density, q is the elementary charge, V is the volume of the semiconductor active area.

From another source (textbook) I have:

\frac{1}{\tau} = \frac{\partial R}{\partial n}

where

R(n) = An + Bn^2 + Cn^3

and also the injected current I is related to n as follows:

I = qVR(n)

I have a complete mental block on how whether I can derive the first equation from the following three - any help would be appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am also confused about something from the textbook: it uses equations 2,3 and 4 above to define the relationship between \tau and I as being:

\frac {1}{\tau^2} = A^2 + \frac{4B}{qV}I}

I just keep going round in circles when I try to derive this from equations 2,3 and 4 :(
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top