Derivation of Exponential Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter roadworx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the exponential equation involving a summation of squared differences divided by the variable x_i. The initial expression is expanded by applying the square formula, leading to three separate sums. One of these sums, which equals nμ, contributes to the exponential term exp(nλ/μ). There is also a query about the correct interpretation of the denominator, suggesting it may need clarification as either 2^μ^2 or 2μ^2. The conversation highlights the algebraic manipulation necessary to achieve the desired simplification.
roadworx
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
hi,

I have:

exp \left(-\frac{\lambda}{2^\mu^2} \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{(x_i-\mu)^2}{x_i}\right)

I am trying to work out why this simplifies to:

exp\left(\frac{n \lambda}{\mu}\right) exp \left( -\frac{\lambda}{2^\mu^2} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i -\frac{ \lambda}{2} \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{x_i} \right)

Any ideas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
roadworx said:
hi,

I have:

exp \left(-\frac{\lambda}{2^\mu^2} \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{(x_i-\mu)^2}{x_i}\right)

I am trying to work out why this simplifies to:

exp\left(\frac{n \lambda}{\mu}\right) exp \left( -\frac{\lambda}{2^\mu^2} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i -\frac{ \lambda}{2} \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{x_i} \right)

Any ideas?
Multiply out that square: (x_i- \mu)^2= x_i^2- 2\mu x_i+ \mu^2. Dividing by x_i gives
\frac{(x_i- \mu)^2}{x_i}= x_i- 2\mu+ \frac{mu^2}{x_i}
so that sum can be written as three different sums.

That second sum is \sum_{i=1}^n \mu= n\mu and that is the exponential
exp\left(\frac{n\lambda}{\mu}\right)

Now, that denominator: is that
2^{\mu^2}
or
2^{2\mu}
or just 2\mu^2

It looks like it is supposed to be 2 to a power but to get that result it must be 2\mu^2.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
585
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
785
Back
Top