How Is Time Factored Into the Derivation of the Ideal Gas Law?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the ideal gas law, specifically addressing the role of time in the equation for force as it relates to momentum change. Participants clarify that the time referenced in the equation F = Δp/Δt pertains to the time it takes for a particle to travel to the opposite wall of a container and back, rather than the time of collision with the wall. Key formulas discussed include F = ma, a = Δv/Δt, and Δp = mΔv, which collectively support the derivation of the force equation. The conversation concludes with a clear understanding of how time is factored into the derivation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion, particularly F = ma
  • Familiarity with momentum concepts, specifically Δp = mΔv
  • Knowledge of kinematics, including distance, speed, and time relationships
  • Basic grasp of the ideal gas law and its derivation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the ideal gas law in detail
  • Explore the relationship between force, momentum, and time in physics
  • Learn about impulse and its applications in collision scenarios
  • Investigate advanced kinematic equations and their implications in gas behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching gas laws, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of thermodynamics and kinetic theory.

eddywalrus
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Here is a screenshot from a page from a textbook that explains how to derive the ideal gas law:
upload_2015-3-18_12-7-52.png


In the third bold line, I don't understand how "time" in force = (change of momentum)/(time) is equal to 2x/u (the time it takes for the particle to travel to the opposite face and back again) -- I always assumed that:

impulse = Force x time
change in momentum = Force x time
where time in this case refers to the time of contact between the two colliding objects? Furthermore, since the particle doesn't change its momentum over the duration of traveling to the opposite face and back again (but instead changes momentum during its collision with the container wall), shouldn't the "time" in this case refer to the time of collision?

Thank you so much for all your help!
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure you can derive (change of momentum)/(time) from some basic formulas.

F = ma
a = Δv/Δt
Δp = mΔv

F = ma and a = Δv/Δt gets you F = mΔv/Δt

F = mΔv/Δt and Δp = mΔv gets you F = Δp/Δt
 
Evanish said:
I'm pretty sure you can derive (change of momentum)/(time) from some basic formulas.

F = ma
a = Δv/Δt
Δp = mΔv

F = ma and a = Δv/Δt gets you F = mΔv/Δt

F = mΔv/Δt and Δp = mΔv gets you F = Δp/Δt

Thank you for your help, but I think you misunderstood my question -- I probably should have made it clearer. My bad, sorry.

I get how you would derive force = (change in momentum)/(time), but I'm unsure of why "time" in this instance is the time it takes for the particle to travel to the other face and back instead of the time of collision or contact between the particle and the container wall.

Thank you!
 
eddywalrus said:
the time of collision or contact between the particle and the container wall

Already considered in the statement,
+mu - (-mu) = 2mu
for the particle interacting with the wall.

eddywalrus said:
time it takes for the particle to travel to the other face and back
As in the textbook,
time between collisions = distance /speed = 2x/u

The particle interacts with the wall only once every interval, and not continuously during the interval.
So we want to find a force, that if acting continuously, would give the same force on the wall as from the intermittent collisions of the particle with the wall.
 
256bits said:
Already considered in the statement,
+mu - (-mu) = 2mu
for the particle interacting with the wall.As in the textbook,
time between collisions = distance /speed = 2x/u

The particle interacts with the wall only once every interval, and not continuously during the interval.
So we want to find a force, that if acting continuously, would give the same force on the wall as from the intermittent collisions of the particle with the wall.

Thank you very much for your explanation -- I understand it now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K