Derivation of the atomic form factor

mjordan2nd
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
My book defines the atomic form factor as

\int dV n_{j}(\vec{r})e^{-i \vec{G} \bullet \vec{r}}.

where n(r) is the electron density of the jth atom at r, and G is the reciprocal lattice vector. It says the above expression is equal to

2 \pi \int dr r^{2} d(cos \alpha) n_{j}(r) e^{-iGr cos \alpha}

in the case that the electron distribution is spherically symmetric where alpha is the angle between the reciprocal lattice vector and r. I don't understand how the author goes from the first equation to the second. In fact, I'm not sure I'm comfortable with this d(cos) notation at all. If someone could point me to a site where I could read up about that, I would appreciate it. The author then proceeds to integrate d(cos) from -1 to 1. Why he does this is unclear to me as well. Any help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral is done in spherical coordinates.
The z axis is taken along the direction of the G vector so the angle between r and G si theta (the polar angle).
The volum element in spherical coordinates is
dV=r^2 sin(theta) dr d(theta) d(phi)
The author writes sin(theta)d(theta) as d(cos theta).
n(r) is asumed to have spherical symmetry here so it depends on the r (magnitude, not vector) only.

For more on sperical coordinates, you can see this, for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_coordinate_system
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top