Derivation of the Boltzmann Distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the Boltzmann Distribution using McQuarrie's "Statistical Mechanics." The canonical ensemble is established with fixed parameters N, V, and T, where heat exchange occurs between microsystems but matter does not. The occupation numbers for energy states are denoted as a1, a2, a3, etc. A key point of contention is the derivation of the equation -ln(a_{i}) - α - 1 - βE_{i} = 0, where the additional -1 term is attributed to Stirling's series, an asymptotic expansion of the logarithm.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of canonical ensembles in statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with McQuarrie's "Statistical Mechanics" concepts
  • Knowledge of Stirling's approximation and its applications
  • Basic grasp of microstates and occupation numbers in thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Boltzmann Distribution in McQuarrie's "Statistical Mechanics"
  • Explore Stirling's approximation and its implications in statistical mechanics
  • Investigate canonical ensembles and their properties in thermodynamic systems
  • Review methods for maximizing functions subject to constraints in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying statistical mechanics, as well as researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of thermodynamic distributions.

scorpion990
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I'm using McQuarrie's "Statistical Mechanics" for a class, and I'm not quite understanding the the derivation of the Boltzmann Distribution. I'm going to go through it, and then ask a few questions along the way.

All right. You start with a canonical ensemble with N, V, and T fixed. Heat can be exchanged between microsystems, but matter cannot. Each microsystem has a spectrum of energies E1, E2, E3, ... that are repeated for degeneracy as needed. The occupation numbers of each energy state are denoted by a1, a2, a3, etc, and represent the number of microstates that are in energy stated E1, E2, E3, etc.

Imagine that each energy level is a "box" that contains as many particles as its occupation number. A specific distribution of occupation numbers can be achieved in:
W(a) = \sum^{n}_{i=1}\frac{A!}{\prod^{n}_{i=1}a_{i}!}
So that:
ln(W(a)) = Aln(A) - A - \sum^{n}_{i=1}ln(a_{i}!) =Aln(A) - A - \sum^{n}_{i=1}(a_{i}ln(a_{i})-a_{i})
Subject to the constraints:
\sum^{n}_{i=1}a_{i}=A
and
\sum^{n}_{i=1}E_{i}a_{i}=\zeta

Now.. Here's where many books and I disagree... They say that the set of equations derived by maximizing the above system is:
-ln(a_{i})-\alpha-1 - \beta E_{i} = 0

However, when I do it out, I get:
-ln(a_{i})-\alpha - \beta E_{i} = 0

I have no idea where their extra -1 term come from.

In addition, I don't understand most books' method of finding alpha. can somebody guide me through this process more clearly? Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi.

scorpion990 said:
Now.. Here's where many books and I disagree... They say that the set of equations derived by maximizing the above system is:
-ln(a_{i})-\alpha-1 - \beta E_{i} = 0

-1 comes from Stirling's series, the asymptotic expansion of the logarithm.

Regards.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K