Derivation of the density of states?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the density of states in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of a three-dimensional potential box and the Schrödinger equation. Participants are examining the relationship between quantum states in k-space and their corresponding energy states.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the density of states and expresses confusion regarding discrepancies between their result and the standard textbook expression. They explore the relationship between the number of states in a shell and the density of states.
  • Some participants question the interpretation of the terms used, particularly the distinction between the number of states in a shell and the density of states.
  • Others suggest that the density of states should be defined in terms of the derivative of the number of states with respect to energy, leading to further exploration of the definitions involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the derivation and definitions related to the density of states. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of terms and the mathematical relationships involved. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of degeneracy and how it affects the density of states.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion regarding the definitions and calculations involved in deriving the density of states, as well as the impact of degeneracy on the results. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and clarifications regarding the mathematical expressions used.

patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
i have a question concerning the derivation of the density of states
Relevant Equations
g(E) =sqrt(2)/pi^2*(m/hbar^2)^(3/2)*sqrt(E)
hi guys
i have a question about the derivation of the density of states , after solving the Schrödinger equation in the 3d potential box and using the boundary conditions ... etc we came to the conclusion that the quantum state occupy a volume of ##\frac{\pi^{3}}{V_{T}}## in k space
and to count the total number of quantum states its easier to count them in a shell with thickness dk then integrate , so we have :
$$N_{shell} =\frac{\frac{1}{8}4\pi*k^{2}dk}{\frac{\pi^{3}}{V_{T}}}$$
then integrating to get the total number of states give us :
$$N_{T} =\frac{V_{T}}{(2\pi^{2})}\frac{1}{3}k^{3}$$
and translating that expression in terms of the energy
$$N_{T} =\frac{V}{3}(\frac{\sqrt(2)}{\pi^{2}})(\frac{m}{\hbar^{2}})^{3/2}E^{3/2}$$
now dividing by V and E to get the number of quantum states per unit volume and energy give us :
$$g(E) =\frac{1}{3}(\frac{\sqrt(2)}{\pi^{}2})(\frac{m}{\hbar^{2}})^{3/2}E^{1/2}$$
but that expression doesn't look similer to the standerd one in textbooks
$$g(E) =(\frac{\sqrt(2)}{\pi^{}2})(\frac{m}{\hbar^{2}})^{3/2}E^{1/2}$$
what i am doing wrong here ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't ##g(E)## rather what you called ##N_{\text{shell}}## expressed in terms of ##E=\hbar^2 k^2/(2m)##? Note that you also have to express also ##\mathrm{d} k## in terms of ##\mathrm{d} E##. With this you get the textbook result, i.e.,
$$g(E)=\frac{\sqrt{m^3 E}}{\sqrt{2} \hbar^3 \pi^2}.$$
 
vanhees71 said:
Isn't ##g(E)## rather what you called ##N_{\text{shell}}## expressed in terms of ##E=\hbar^2 k^2/(2m)##? Note that you also have to express also ##\mathrm{d} k## in terms of ##\mathrm{d} E##. With this you get the textbook result, i.e.,
$$g(E)=\frac{\sqrt{m^3 E}}{\sqrt{2} \hbar^3 \pi^2}.$$
i am a little bit confused here , isn't ##N_{\text{shell}}## is just the number of quantum states in the shell dk and the density of states is defined as the number of quantum sates per unit volume per unit energy , so i cannot just say that ##\frac{N_{\text{shell}}}{V}## is ##g(E) ## since i need to get the total states by integration then divide by ##V## then divide by ##E## ? , replacing k and dk in ##N_{\text{shell}}## expression gives me :
$$ \frac{V}{2}*\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\pi^{2}}*(\frac{m}{\hbar^2})^{3/2}\sqrt{E}dE $$
which is not slimier to the expression i need :
$$g(E) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\pi^{2}}*(\frac{m}{\hbar^2})^{3/2}\sqrt{E}$$
am i misinterpreting something here ?
 
What's meant is by definition
$$g(E)=\frac{1}{V_T} \frac{\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}}{\mathrm{d}E}=\frac{1}{V_T} \frac{\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}}{\mathrm{d}k} \frac{\mathrm{d} k}{\mathrm{d} E}.$$
Your ##N_{\text{shell}}## should be rather ##\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}##.

Your additional factor 2 may be from a degeneracy of states, e.g., if you refer to the em. field in a cavity where for (almost all) ##\vec{k}## you have ##g=2## distinct polarization states.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: patric44
vanhees71 said:
What's meant is by definition
$$g(E)=\frac{1}{V_T} \frac{\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}}{\mathrm{d}E}=\frac{1}{V_T} \frac{\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}}{\mathrm{d}k} \frac{\mathrm{d} k}{\mathrm{d} E}.$$
Your ##N_{\text{shell}}## should be rather ##\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}##.

Your additional factor 2 may be from a degeneracy of states, e.g., if you refer to the em. field in a cavity where for (almost all) ##\vec{k}## you have ##g=2## distinct polarization states.
oh i think i got it now , so the density of states is just the number of energy states per unit volume confined to that specific dk shell , and the extra degeneracy will cancel the extra ##\frac{1}{2}## that i don't want , isn't that right ?
i am sorry but why is it defined that way ? its a bit confusing , isn't it just more intuitive to define the density of states as the total states in the 1/8 sphere per unit volume per unit energy ?!
 
That would give you the average density whereas you want the density for a given ##E##.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and patric44

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K