Derivation of van der pol oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the van der Pol oscillator equation from a characteristic equation involving a diode circuit. The user is attempting to fit a third-degree polynomial to the curve as outlined in the referenced paper by Hairer. Key challenges include manipulating the polynomial terms, particularly the U^2 and U^3 terms, to align with the van der Pol form. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying derivatives and substitutions to simplify the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the van der Pol oscillator equation
  • Familiarity with polynomial fitting techniques
  • Knowledge of differential equations and their applications in circuit analysis
  • Proficiency in manipulating characteristic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of polynomial fitting in the context of differential equations
  • Learn about the van der Pol oscillator and its significance in nonlinear dynamics
  • Explore techniques for simplifying higher-order terms in differential equations
  • Review the referenced paper by Hairer for detailed methodologies on polynomial manipulation
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in electrical engineering, applied mathematics, and physics who are working on nonlinear oscillators and circuit analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Slightly
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given characteristic equation for a circuit containing a diode, I must figure out how to fit a polynomial to the curve so that the van der pol equation is obtained.

The paper I am reading is here:

http://www.unige.ch/math/hairer60/pres/pres_rentrop.pdf

My doubts are located on page three where the author talks about fitting the polynomial of degree three. I am trying to fill in the details as it isn't quite clear what he is actually doing.

Suggestions?

Should I plug the polynomial into the characteristic equation and manipulate it? Or is there some other technique?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He is just filling it in I think.

C\ddot{U} + \left( \frac{RC}{L} + \frac{d}{du}\left(a_1U +a_2U^2 +a_3U^3\right)\right)\dot{U} + \frac{1}{L}\left(R(a_1U +a_2U^2 +a_3U^3) + U - U_{op}\right)

It looks like it is going to look as is stated. Have you tried it and doesn't it work?
 
barefeet said:
He is just filling it in I think.

C\ddot{U} + \left( \frac{RC}{L} + \frac{d}{du}\left(a_1U +a_2U^2 +a_3U^3\right)\right)\dot{U} + \frac{1}{L}\left(R(a_1U +a_2U^2 +a_3U^3) + U - U_{op}\right)

It looks like it is going to look as is stated. Have you tried it and doesn't it work?
Yea, I tried plugging everything in like you just did, but I could not figure out how to get rid of the U^3 term.
 
In the bracket it vanishes due to the derivative, but outside it does not.
Setting y=U+d with the right constant d gets rid of the U term in the brackets, but then you still have those U^2 and U^3 outside.
 
That's exactly what I don't want. I'm trying to figure out how they get to the van der pol equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K