Hello everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm new to this forum and this is my first post. I hope this is the right place to ask the following.

I've been reading up a little on PDE theory lately, and the following point has been causing me a bit of confusion.

In the definition of the weak solution of a parabolic PDE, one considers Banach-space valued functions

[itex]u\in L^2\left(0,T; H_0^1(\Omega)\right)[/itex]

such that

[itex]u' \in L^2\left(0,T; H^{-1}(\Omega)\right)[/itex]

Here [itex]T>0[/itex] and [itex]\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^n[/itex] ([itex]n\ge 3[/itex]) is bounded open.

Does [itex]u'[/itex] here refer to the weak derivative of [itex]u[/itex], i.e. the function defined by

[itex]\int_0^T u'(t)\phi(t) \;\mathrm{d}t := -\int_0^T u(t) \phi'(t) \;\mathrm{d}t \quad \mbox{for all $\phi\in C^\infty_c(0,T)$} [/itex]

(Here the integrals are Bochner integrals.)

If so, how does one make sense of the above expression? Specifically, my gripe is that the left-hand side technically belongs to [itex]H^{-1}(\Omega)[/itex] while the right-hand side belongs to [itex]H_0^1(\Omega)[/itex]. Is one supposed to identify both sides via the self-duality of [itex]H_0^1(\Omega)[/itex] as a Hilbert space?

In which case, what is the rationale for distinguishing between [itex]L^2\left(0,T; H_0^1(\Omega)\right)[/itex] and [itex]L^2\left(0,T; H^{-1}(\Omega)\right)[/itex] (for example, in the definition of the weak solution to a parabolic PDE) in the first place?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Derivative of Banach-space valued functions, and weak solutions

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**