Derivative of (x+3)(x-4)(x+5): A Simple Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter sbose27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of the expression (x+3)(x-4)(x+5), which involves applying the product rule in calculus. The original poster expresses difficulty in executing this process correctly.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the product rule but feels uncertain about their approach. Some participants provide a formula for the derivative of a product of three functions and confirm that the original poster's method should work.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the application of the product rule, with some guidance offered on how to structure the derivative calculation. There is an acknowledgment that the original poster's method is theoretically sound, but they are experiencing challenges in execution.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions time constraints due to an upcoming class, which may be impacting their ability to fully engage with the problem-solving process.

sbose27
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sorry for not using JavaScript or whatever script is needed, I don't have enough time to figure it out b/c my class is soon... anyways I just need to know know to find the derivative of 3 groups of parentheses

(x+3)(x-4)(x+5)

I've tried using the product rule on the first two and then using the rule on the result from that and (x+5) but it's not working. I'm an idiot.. thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a simple extension of the product rule: (uvw)' = u'vw + uv'w + uvw', where u,v and w are functions of x.
 
neutrino said:
It's a simple extension of the product rule: (uvw)' = u'vw + uv'w + uvw', where u,v and w are functions of x.

okay thanks a lot
 
sbose27 said:
I've tried using the product rule on the first two and then using the rule on the result from that and (x+5) but it's not working.

That should work actually.
If you call the 3 functions u(x), v(x) and w(x) and let y(x) = u(x)v(x), then [y(x)w(x)]' = y'w + yw'. Just replace y = uv and y' = u'v + uv', you get (u'v + uv')w + uvw' = u'vw + uv'w + uvw', which is exactly what neutrino.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K