I have a scalar function of position only, V(r) where r is the position vector (x, y,z). Since V depends only on position, is it true to say that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

dV/dx = dV/dy = dV/dz ?

(these should be partial derivatives)

I am trying to show L = r x [nab] commutes with any radial function V(r) meaning that for any function f

r x [nab] ( V(r) * f) - V(r) * r x [nab] f = 0

most of the terms cancel out but I am left with

(y dV/dz - x dV/dz -zdV/dy + xdV/dy + z dVdx - y dV/dx) * f

or (y (dV/dz - dV/dx) + x( dV/dy - dVdz ) +z( dV/dx - dV/dy ) ) * f

If the partial derivatives cancel then I am done. If not I have no clue how to continue but I do know the final answer must be zero.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Derivatives of a radial function

Loading...

Similar Threads - Derivatives radial function | Date |
---|---|

I Derivative and Parameterisation of a Contour Integral | Feb 7, 2018 |

I Why does this concavity function not work for this polar fun | Jan 26, 2018 |

I Euler Lagrange formula with higher derivatives | Jan 24, 2018 |

I Derivative of infinitesimal value | Jan 15, 2018 |

Directional derivative: radial direction | Aug 27, 2006 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**