Derive Relative Intensities from LS-Coupling Sum Rules

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving relative intensities from LS-coupling sum rules for the transitions between multiplets. In part (a), the sum rule was successfully verified by summing the intensities and confirming they yield a constant when divided by 2J + 1. In part (b), the user set up equations for the relative intensities but faced challenges due to too many unknowns. A response clarified that the constants from the sum rules were missing, suggesting that two equations could be derived from the 2F and 3G multiplets to solve for the unknowns. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the sum rules to derive the necessary relationships for the multiplet transitions.
John Greger
Messages
34
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The table gives the theoretical relative intensities in LS-coupling for all possible ##^3F – ^3G## transitions.

a) Use this data to verify the sum rules for

LS-intensities in a multiplet.
b) Use the sum rules to derive the relative intensities in a ##^2D – ^2F## multiplet. Hint: denote the intensities a, b and c and solve a system of equations.

Homework Equations


##\Sigma I / g = constant##. Where g=2J + 1

The Attempt at a Solution



So in a it was easy to verify the sum rule above. By simply summing the intensities for each column/row divide by 2J + 1 and se that the values was constants for the columns and rows.

However, in b). I sat up the equations $$a+b = 8*D_1$$
$$c = 8*6_1$$ and $$a+b = 10*D_2$$ $$b+c = 8*D_2$$

But I have to many unknown variables here. D1 and D2 is the constants for the rows and columns, respectively.

But perhaps D1 and D2 are the same as they where for the tripplet G and F, because then the problem is very simple. (I have no solutions so I don't know the right answer).
 

Attachments

  • Skärmavbild 2018-08-08 kl. 18.18.37.png
    Skärmavbild 2018-08-08 kl. 18.18.37.png
    9.6 KB · Views: 546
Physics news on Phys.org
Any help would be appreciated. A:Your equations are correct but you are missing the constants from the sum rules. $\sum_{i} \frac{I_{i}(J)}{2J+1} = k$ where k is a constant. Since you have a 2F, 3G multiplet you can use this equation twice to get two equations with two unknowns. The equation for the 2F multiplet is $\frac{a+b}{3} = \frac{2}{7}$ and the equation for the 3G multiplet is $\frac{a+b+c}{5} = \frac{3}{13}$ which should give you the solution.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
8K
2
Replies
86
Views
22K
Replies
18
Views
4K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Back
Top