Deriving a Hamiltonian from dimensionless equations

AI Thread Summary
Deriving the Hamiltonian for an aeroelastic system should ideally be based on "undimensionalised" equations of motion to ensure accurate representation of the total energy of the system. Using dimensionless equations may lead to incorrect results, as they do not account for the actual energy values. The process involves guessing a form of the Lagrangian, determining canonical momentum, and performing a Legendre transform. It is crucial to maintain dimensional integrity in this derivation. Ensuring the Hamiltonian reflects the true energy dynamics is essential for accurate modeling.
thrillhouse86
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

(As I mentioned in my previous post) I am trying to derive the Hamiltonian for a aeroelastic system, where the dynamical equations of motion (determined by Newtonian Mechanics) are known.

My process has been to
1. "guess" a form of the Lagrangian, check that it recreates the equations of motion
2. determine the canonical momentum
3. Perform a Legendre transform from the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian

I've been thinking recently though, that the equations of motion are in dimensionless form (i.e. the equations have been appropriately scaled so that they are unitless). My question is:
Is it acceptable to derive the Hamiltonian from the dimensionless equations of motion, or do I have to use the "undimensionalised" equations of motion ? -

My rationale for this question is that the Hamiltonian does have to give me the total energy of the system - and I'm not sure that working from dimensionless equations will give me that ...

Cheers,
Thrillhouse
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Thrillhouse,

It sounds like you're on the right track and have done a lot of work already. I think it is better to use the "undimensionalised" equations of motion when deriving the Hamiltonian, as that will give you the total energy of the system. The dimensionless equations might not provide the correct results. Good luck with your research!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top