Deriving current from decharging capacitor and homogenous DE

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a differential equation (DE) for current from a discharging capacitor connected to a resistor. The original formulation of Ohm's law and the subsequent DE led to a solution where current diverges over time, which was unexpected. The error identified is a sign mistake in the derivation; the correct relationship should reflect that current decreases over time. The corrected DE indicates that current converges to zero, aligning with the expected behavior of a discharging capacitor. Understanding the sign conventions in the equations is crucial for accurate modeling of the circuit behavior.
Jonsson
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

I want learn to do homogenous differential equations and I cannot work out what is wrong in this example. Hope you'll be able to tell me why my DE is unsatisfactory.

Assume that a capacitor is has charge Q and that the terminal with the high voltage is connected to a switch in line with a resistor which in turn is connected to the low terminal on the cap.

When the switch is closed, I write ohms law:
##i = \frac{v}{R}##
The current in the circuit will be proportional to the voltage across the capacitor plates.

The from there I rewrite ohms law using the definition of capacitance and differentiate to get the DE:

$$
i=\frac{v}{R} = \frac{q}{RC} \implies \frac{d i}{dt} = \frac{i}{RC}
$$

I solve the DE and find:

$$
i = C e^{t/(RC)},
$$
Where ##C## is some constant. The problem is that the current diverges as a function of time.

I wanted expected something along the lines of:

##i = Ce^{-t/(RC)},##

Where the current converge to zero of as time pass.

What is unsatisfactory with the DE I started with? I think it looks correct, and cannot find anything wrong with it. Perhaps you can help. :)

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,
Marius
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You simply made a sign mistake in your derivation of the DE. Here you integrate the electric along the circuit from the positively charged plate to the negatively charged plate, this gives you -U=Q/C. Further, since \vec{j} = \sigma \vec{E} along the wire, you have i positive in this direction. Thus the right equation is
i=-\frac{Q}{R C},
and the rest of the calculation is analogous to the one you've presented.
 
  • Like
Likes Jonsson
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top