Deriving Descriptions of Conic Sections from Fundamental Definition

AI Thread Summary
A conic section is formed by the intersection of a plane with a right circular cone, and various geometric and algebraic descriptions exist. The discussion highlights the lack of derivations from the fundamental definition, particularly concerning the directrix and its relationship to the focus of the conic. Dandelin Spheres provide a method for deriving properties of ellipses, but a proof for the ratio of distances to the focus and directrix is sought. Participants share resources, including links to derivations and explanations. Ultimately, the original inquiry was resolved with a helpful reference found in the discussion.
CarlisleLes
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Everyone knows by now that a conic section is the figure formed when a plane intersects a right circular cone. Most everyone also knows that there are many different ways to describe a conic, geometrically and algebraically. What one seldom sees is the derivation of those descriptions from the fundamental definition. Using Dandelin Spheres it is easy to accomplish this for an ellipse. What I have never seen is a proof, based on the fundamental definition, of the equivalence of the ratio of the distances of a point on the conic to the focus and to the directrix, or even a definition of the directrix itself. Can anyone supply or direct me to such information? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have read that a dozen times. It doesn't explain the directrix derivation - just says it's possible to do so.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top