A Deriving DOS: Solve the Mystery of the 2x Factor!

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Array
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Dos
Array
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I have a very particular question on the derivation of DOS.

For a particle in an infinite box k=π/L. However, when deriving the density of states, all textbooks use k=2π/L

Now you could argue that they account for spin degeneracy, but its not that! Because in the textbooks that happens (again) in a later step

So where is this factor 2 coming from?

Thanks,

Array
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Array said:
For a particle in an infinite box k=π/L. However, when deriving the density of states, all textbooks use k=2π/L

the solution of Schrodinger’s equation for particle in a 3D box
where Each solution can be uniquely associated with
a k- space vector ; k^2 = k(x) ^2 +k(y)^2 + k(z)^2 the boundary condition gives k =n.pi/L
The k has three axes k(x) ,k(y), k(z) the conditions at the walls are k(x) =n(x).pi/L .... and similarly for k (y) and K*z) and so on where n(x), n(y) and n(z) can take values as +/- 1, +/-2,. +/-3...
some of the texts might have used n(x) taking values 1.2,3,... so for proper counting the states they might have used 2.(pi)/L
see for details-http://web.eng.fiu.edu/npala/EEE6397ex/EEE_6397_Ch2_Energy%20Levels%20and%20Charge%20Carriers%20in%20Semiconductors_PART3.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the link, I derive it the same way.

You're right. If they use 2π/L then they must take the entire k-space into consideration, because they didn't differ between +/-. Where as if you take the π/L if did already differ between positiv and negative solutions and you only take the respective segment in k-space?!

Thanks
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top